NDAR Federation Creates Largest Source of Autism Research Data to Date

NIH-funded Database Sets Standard for Collaboration and Data Sharing

Source: NDAR

A data partnership between the National Database for Autism Research (NDAR), and the Autism Genetic Resource Exchange (AGRE) positions NDAR as possibly the largest repository to date of genetic, phenotypic, clinical, and medical imaging data related to research on autism spectrum disorders (ASD)LPC Continuing Education

“The collaboration between AGRE and NDAR exemplifies the efforts of government and stakeholders to work together for a common cause,” said Thomas R. Insel, M.D., director of the National Institute of Mental Health, part of NIH. “NDAR continues to be a leader in the effort to standardize and share ASD data with the research community, and serves as a model to all research communities.”

NDAR is supported by the National Institutes of Health; AGRE is an Autism Speaks program.

NDAR’s mission is to facilitate data sharing and scientific collaboration on a broad scale, providing a shared common platform for autism researchers to accelerate scientific discovery. Built around the concept of federated repositories, NDAR integrates and standardizes data, tools, and computational techniques across multiple public and private autism databases. Through NDAR, researchers can access results from these different sources at the same time, using the rich data set to conduct independent analyses, supplement their own research data, or evaluate the data supporting published journal articles, among many other uses.

Databases previously federated with NDAR include Autism Speaks’ Autism Tissue Program, the Kennedy Krieger Institute’s Interactive Autism Network (IAN), and the NIH Pediatric MRI Data Repository. AGRE currently houses a clinical dataset with detailed medical, developmental, morphological, demographic, and behavioral information from people with ASD and their families.

Approved NDAR users will have access to data from the 25,000 research participants represented in NDAR, as well as 2,500 AGRE families and more than 7,500 participants who reported their own information to IAN.

NDAR is supported by NIMH, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, and the NIH Center for Information Technology.

###

The mission of the NIMH is to transform the understanding and treatment of mental illnesses through basic and clinical research, paving the way for prevention, recovery and cure. For more information, visit the NIMH website.

About the National Institutes of Health (NIH): NIH, the nation's medical research agency, includes 27 Institutes and Centers and is a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. NIH is the primary federal agency conducting and supporting basic, clinical, and translational medical research, and is investigating the causes, treatments, and cures for both common and rare diseases. For more information about NIH and its programs, visit the NIH website.

Young people say sex, paychecks come in second to self-esteem

COLUMBUS, Ohio – Young people may crave boosts to their self-esteem a little too much, new research suggests.

Researchers found that college students valued boosts to their self-esteem more than any other pleasant activity they were asked about, including sex, favorite foods, drinking alcohol, seeing a best friend or receiving a paycheck.

"It is somewhat surprising how this desire to feel worthy and valuable trumps almost any other pleasant activity you can imagine," said Brad Bushman, lead author of the research and professor of communication and psychology at The Ohio State University.

Bushman conducted the research with Scott Moeller of Brookhaven National Laboratory and Jennifer Crocker, professor of psychology at Ohio State. The study appears online in the Journal of Personality and will be published in a future print edition.

In two separate studies, the researchers asked college students how much they wanted and liked various pleasant activities, such as their favorite food or seeing a best friend. They were asked to rate how much they wanted and liked each activity on a scale of 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely).

One of the items they were asked about was self-esteem building experiences, such as receiving a good grade or receiving a compliment.

"We found that self-esteem trumped all other rewards in the minds of these college students," Bushman said.

Those students who indicated they highly valued self-esteem also showed it in the laboratory Continuing Education for Counselors

In one study, the participants took a test which purportedly measured their intellectual ability. Afterwards, the students were told if they waited another ten minutes, they could have their test re-scored using a new scoring algorithm that usually yields higher test results.

Students who highly valued self-esteem were more likely to stay to get the new scores.

"They were willing to spend their own precious time just to get a small boost in their self-esteem," Bushman said.

Bushman said there is nothing wrong with a healthy sense of self-esteem. But the results of this study suggest many young people may be a little too focused on pumping up their self-esteem.

Here's why: for all the pleasant activities examined in this study, participants were asked to rate both how much they liked the activity and how much they wanted it. Both questions were asked because addiction research suggests that addicts tend to report they "want" the object of their addiction (drugs, alcohol, gambling) more than they actually "like" it, Bushman said.

"The liking-wanting distinction has occupied an important place in addiction research for nearly two decades," Moeller said. "But we believe it has great potential to inform other areas of psychology as well."

In this study, participants liked all the pleasant activities more than they wanted them, which is healthy, Bushman said. But the difference between liking and wanting was smallest when it came to self-esteem.

"It wouldn't be correct to say that the study participants were addicted to self-esteem," Bushman said. "But they were closer to being addicted to self-esteem than they were to being addicted to any other activity we studied."

Findings showed that people with a strong sense of entitlement were the ones who were most likely to "want" the good things in life – including boosts to their self-esteem – even more than they actually "like" them.

Entitlement was measured as part of a narcissism scale which participants completed. In the scale, participants had to choose which of two statements they most agreed with. For example, people who scored high on entitlement were more likely to agree with "If I ruled the world, it would be a much better place" rather than "The thought of ruling the world frightens the hell out of me."

"Entitled people want all the good things in life, even if they don't particularly like them," Bushman said. "Of course, there's no problem with enjoying good things, but it is not healthy to want them more than you like them."

Bushman said he sees danger in this obsession with self-esteem. Research has shown that levels of self-esteem have been increasing, at least among college students in the United States, since the mid-1960s.

"American society seems to believe that self-esteem is the cure all for every social ill, from bad grades to teen pregnancies to violence," he said. "But there has been no evidence that boosting self-esteem actually helps with these problems. We may be too focused on increasing self-esteem."

Study co-author Crocker added, "The problem isn't with having high self-esteem; it's how much people are driven to boost their self-esteem. When people highly value self-esteem, they may avoid doing things such as acknowledging a wrong they did. Admitting you were wrong may be uncomfortable for self-esteem at the moment, but ultimately it could lead to better learning, relationships, growth, and even future self-esteem."

The study was partially supported by grants from the National Institute of Mental Health and the National Institute on Drug Abuse.

Thinking Globally to Improve Mental Health

Source: NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (NASA-JPL)

Mental health experts are calling for a greater world focus on improving access to care and treatment for mental, neurological, and substance use (MNS) disorders, as well as increasing discoveries in research that will enable this goal to be met LPC Continuing Education

The Grand Challenges in Global Mental Health Initiative, led by the National Institutes of Health and the Global Alliance for Chronic Diseases, has identified the top 40 barriers to better mental health around the world. Similar to past grand challenges, which focused on infectious diseases and chronic, noncommunicable diseases, this initiative seeks to build a community of funders dedicated to supporting research that will significantly improve the lives of people living with MNS disorders within the next 10 years.

Twenty-five of the specific challenges and the process used to derive them are described in an article that will be published on July 7, 2011, in the journal Nature.

"Participating in global mental health research is an enormous opportunity, a means to accelerate advances in mental health care for the diverse U.S. population, as well as an extension of our vision of a world where mental illnesses are prevented and cured," said Thomas R. Insel, M.D., director of the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), the NIH institute heading this effort.

According to the paper's authors, the disorders targeted by the Grand Challenges in Global Mental Health—for example, schizophrenia, depression, epilepsy, dementia, and alcohol dependence—collectively account for more years of life lost to poor health, disability, or early death than either cardiovascular disease or cancer. Yet, compared to illnesses like cardiovascular disease and cancer, there are far fewer effective treatments or preventive methods. In addition, interventions are not widely available to those who need them most.

In recognizing the need to address this imbalance, Pamela Collins, M.D., M.P.H., of the NIMH Office for Research on Disparities and Global Mental Health, and colleagues assembled an international panel of experts to identify research priorities using the Delphi method, a widely accepted consensus-building tool. The panel consisted of 422 experts in fields such as neuroscience, basic behavioral science, mental health services, and epidemiology, and represented more than 60 countries.

Over the course of two months, NIMH staff pared the panel's initial list of 1,565 challenges down to 154, with input from a scientific advisory board. From this list, the expert panel selected the top 40, of which the top five challenges identified after the third and final round of ranking are:
Integrate screening and core packages of services into routine primary health care
Reduce the cost and improve the supply of effective medications
Improve children's access to evidence-based care by trained health providers in low- and middle-income countries
Provide effective and affordable community-based care and rehabilitation
Strengthen the mental health component in the training of all health care personnel.

These top five challenges were ranked according to the ability to reduce the burden of disease, ability to reduce inequalities in health and health care, length of time until results can be observed, and the ability for the topic to be researched effectively.

"Addressing these challenges could have far-reaching effects, including increasing access to services and ultimately, reducing the treatment gap associated with these disorders," said Dr. Collins.

The Grand Challenges in Global Mental Health Initiative is led by NIMH and the Global Alliance for Chronic Diseases, in partnership with the Wellcome Trust, the McLaughlin-Rotman Centre for Global Health, and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. Other NIH components participating in the Grand Challenges in Global Mental Health include the Fogarty International Center; the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.

Reference

Collins PY, Patel V, Joestl SS, March D, Insel TR, Daar A, on behalf of the Grand Challenges in Global Mental Health Scientific Advisory Board and Executive Committee. Grand Challenges in Global Mental Health. Nature. 2011 July 7. 474(7354):pp.

###

The mission of the NIMH is to transform the understanding and treatment of mental illnesses through basic and clinical research, paving the way for prevention, recovery and cure. For more information, visit the NIMH website.

About the National Institutes of Health (NIH): NIH, the nation's medical research agency, includes 27 Institutes and Centers and is a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. NIH is the primary federal agency conducting and supporting basic, clinical, and translational medical research, and is investigating the causes, treatments, and cures for both common and rare diseases. For more information about NIH and its programs, visit the NIH website.

5-minute Screen Identifies Subtle Signs Of Autism in 1-year Olds

NIH-funded Study Demonstrates Feasibility and Effectiveness of Conducting Systematic Screening During Well-Baby Check-Ups

A five-minute checklist that parents can fill out in pediatrician waiting rooms may someday help in the early diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) , according to a study funded by the National Institutes of Health. Published today in the Journal of Pediatrics, the study's design also provides a model for developing a network of pediatricians to adopt such a change to their practice. Continuing education for counselors

"Beyond this exciting proof of concept, such a screening program would answer parents' concerns about their child's possible ASD symptoms earlier and with more confidence than has ever been done before," noted Thomas R. Insel, M.D., director of the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), part of NIH.

Identifying autism at an early age allows children to start treatment sooner, which can greatly improve their later development and learning. However, many studies show a significant delay between the time parents first report concerns about their child's behavior and the eventual ASD diagnosis, with some children not receiving a diagnosis until well after they've started school.

Recognizing the need to improve early ASD screening, Karen Pierce, Ph.D., of the University of California, San Diego, and colleagues established a network of 137 pediatricians across San Diego County. Following an hour-long educational seminar, the pediatricians screened all infants at their 1-year, well-baby check-up using the Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales Developmental Profile Infant-Toddler Checklist, a brief questionnaire that detects ASD, language delay, and developmental delay. The questionnaire asks caregivers about a child's use of eye gaze, sounds, words, gestures, objects and other forms of age-appropriate communication. Any child who failed the screen was referred for further testing and was re-evaluated every six months until age 3.

Out of 10,479 infants screened, 32 were identified as having ASD. After excluding for late onset and regression cases, this is consistent with current rates that would be expected at 12 months, according to the researchers. When including those identified as having language delay, developmental delay, or some other form of delay, the brief screen provided an accurate diagnosis 75 percent of the time.

Following the screen, all toddlers diagnosed with ASD or developmental delay and 89 percent of those with language delay were referred for behavioral therapy. On average, these children were referred for treatment around age 17 months. For comparison, a 2009 study using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that, on average, children currently receive an ASD diagnosis around 5.7 years (68.4 months) of age, with treatment beginning sometime later.

In addition to tracking infant outcomes, the researchers also surveyed the participating pediatricians. Prior to the study, few of the doctors had been screening infants systematically for ASD. After the study, 96 percent of the pediatricians rated the program positively, and 100 percent of the practices have continued using the screening tool.

"In the context of a virtual lack of universal screening at 12 months, this program is one that could be adopted by any pediatric office, at virtually no cost, and can aid in the identification of children with true developmental delays," said Dr. Pierce.

The researchers note that future studies should seek to further validate and refine this screening tool, track children until a much older age, and assess barriers to treatment follow up.

This study was also supported by an NIMH Autism Center of Excellence grant as well as Autism Speaks and the Organization for Autism Research.

Reference
Pierce K, Carter C, Weinfeld M, Desmond J, Hazin R, Bjork R, Gallagher N. Catching, Studying, and Treating Autism Early: The 1-Yr Well-Baby Check-Up Approach. J Pediatr. 2011 Apr. [Epub ahead of print]

###
The mission of the NIMH is to transform the understanding and treatment of mental illnesses through basic and clinical research, paving the way for prevention, recovery and cure. For more information, visit the NIMH website.

About the National Institutes of Health (NIH): NIH, the nation's medical research agency, includes 27 Institutes and Centers and is a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. NIH is the primary federal agency conducting and supporting basic, clinical, and translational medical research, and is investigating the causes, treatments, and cures for both common and rare diseases. For more information about NIH and its programs, visit the NIH website.

Most Children with Rapidly Shifting Moods Don’t Have Bipolar Disorder

Relatively few children with rapidly shifting moods and high energy have bipolar disorder, though such symptoms are commonly associated with the disorder. Instead, most of these children have other types of mental disorders, according to an NIMH-funded study published online ahead of print in the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry on October 5, 2010. Continuing Education for Social Workers
Background
Some parents who take their child to a mental health clinic for assessment report that the child has rapid swings between emotions (usually anger, elation, and sadness) coupled with extremely high energy levels. Some researchers suggest that this is how mania—an important component of bipolar disorder—appears in children. How mania and bipolar disorder are defined in children is important because rapid mood swings and high energy are common among youth.

Furthermore, many experts believe that overdiagnosis and misdiagnosis of bipolar disorder in youth may play a role in the increasing numbers of children being diagnosed with and treated for bipolar disorder. In choosing proper treatment, it is important to know whether children with rapid mood swings and high energy have an early or mild form of bipolar disorder, or instead have a different mental disorder.

In the Longitudinal Assessment of Manic Symptoms (LAMS) study, Robert Findling, M.D., of Case Western Reserve University, and colleagues assessed 707 children, ages 6-12, who were referred for mental health treatment. Of the participants, 621 were rated as having rapid swings between emotions and high energy levels, described as "elevated symptoms of mania" (ESM-positive). Parents of the other 86 children did not report rapid mood swings. These participants were deemed ESM-negative.

Results of the Study
At baseline, all but 14 participants had at least one mental disorder, and many had two or more. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was the most frequent diagnosis, affecting roughly 76 percent in both the ESM-positive and ESM-negative groups. However, only 39 percent were receiving treatment with a stimulant, the most common medication treatment for ADHD, at the start of the study.

Only 11 percent of those with rapid mood swings and high energy (69 out of 621) and 6 percent of those without these symptoms (5 out of 86) had bipolar disorder, meaning that only this small percentage had ever experienced a manic episode, as defined by the current diagnostic system. Of the children with rapid mood swings and high energy, another 12 percent (75 children) had a form of bipolar disorder that includes much shorter manic episodes.

Compared to children without rapid mood swings and high energy, those with these symptoms:

Reported more symptoms of depression, anxiety, manic symptoms, and symptoms of ADHD
Had lower functioning at home, school, or with peers
Were more likely to have a disruptive behavior disorder (oppositional defiant disorder and/or conduct disorder).
Significance
Given that 75 percent of ESM-positive youth did not meet the diagnostic criteria for any bipolar disorder, the researchers suggest that bipolar disorder may not be common among children who experience rapid swings between emotions and high energy levels. Nevertheless, children with these symptoms experience significant impairments due to mood and behavior problems.

The researchers also noted that ESM-positive and ESM-negative youth were prescribed psychotropic medications—including antipsychotics—at similar rates. Further study may provide insight into how serious mental illnesses should be treated in children.

What's Next
The study participants will be re-assessed every 6 months for up to 5 years, allowing the LAMS researchers to determine which children with rapid mood swings and high energy develop bipolar disorder later in life. Such research may inform efforts to identify early markers or predictors of the illness as well as possible protective factors.

Reference
Findling RL, Youngstrom EA, Fristad MA, Birmaher B, Kowatch RA, Arnold E, Frazier TW, Axelson D, Ryan N, Demeter CA, Gill MK, Fields B, Depew J, Kennedy SM, Marsh L, Rowles BM, Horwitz SM. Characteristics of Children With Elevated Symptoms of Mania: The Longitudinal Assessment of Manic Symptoms (LAMS) Study. J Clin Psychiatr. Epub 2010 Oct 5.

Avoiding Holiday Depression

The holiday season is a time of joy, cheer, parties and family-oriented gatherings. But it can also be a time of self-evaluation, loneliness and anxiety about an uncertain future, causing "holiday blues."

Many factors cause holiday blues such as increased stress and fatigue, unrealistic expectations, over-commercialization, financial constraints and the inability to be with family and friends. Increased demands of shopping, parties and houseguests can also cause tension. Even people who do not become depressed can develop other stress reactions during the holidays, such as headaches, excessive drinking, overeating and difficulty sleeping.

Although many people become depressed during the holiday season, even more respond to the excessive stress and anxiety once the holidays have passed. This post-holiday letdown can be the result of emotional disappointments experienced during the preceding months, as well as the physical reactions caused by excess fatigue and stress.

There are several ways to identify potential sources of holiday depression that can help you head off the blues:

s Keep expectations manageable. Set realistic goals for yourself. Pace yourself. Organize your time. Make a list and prioritize the most important activities. Be realistic about what you can and cannot do.

s Remember that the holiday season does not automatically banish reasons for feeling sad or lonely. There is room for these feelings to be present, even if you choose not to express them.

s Let go of the past. Don’t be disappointed if your holidays are not like they used to be. Life brings changes. Each holiday season is different and can be enjoyed in its own way. Look toward the future.

s Do something for someone else. It is an old remedy, but it can help. Try volunteering some time to help others.

s Enjoy holiday activities that are free, such as driving around to look at holiday decorations. Go window shopping without buying anything.

s Don’t drink too much. Excessive drinking will only make you more depressed.

s Don’t be afraid to try something new. Celebrate the holidays in a way you have not done before.

s Spend time with people who are supportive and who care about you. Reach out to make new friends if you are alone during special times. Contact someone you have lost touch with.

s Find time for yourself. Don’t spend all of your time providing activities for your family and friends.

Signs of depression can also include: noticeable weight loss/gain, difficulty sleeping, lack of energy, loss of interest in usual activities and thoughts of suicide. If someone exhibits any of these signs, a Primary Care Manager at Keller should be contacted immediately for proper treatment.
LPC Continuing Education http://www.aspirace.com

Editor’s note: The information in this article came from a Sierra Military Health Care article and from information provided by the Mental Health Association.

OxyContin® Abuse and Addiction Continuing Education CEUs

The media have issued numerous reports about the apparent increase in OxyContin® abuse and addiction. Some of these reports include the following:

• In Madison, Wisconsin, a task force reported a dramatic increase in OxyContin cases since 2003. Most OxyContin making its way onto the streets of Madison and nearby communities was believed to have been stolen from local pharmacies.1
• The police chief in Billerica, Massachusetts, reported a “dramatic increase in OxyContin abuse.”2
• The distribution of OxyContin in Virginia was reported to be well above the national average. In the counties of far southwest Virginia, where the hard physical labor of coal mining and farming leads to a higher incidence of injuries, OxyContin prescriptions were generally 500 percent above the national average.3
• Sixty-nine percent of police chiefs and sheriffs said they have witnessed an increase in the abuse of painkillers such as OxyContin. The areas most affected are eastern Kentucky, New Orleans, southern Maine, Philadelphia, southwestern Pennsylvania, southwestern Virginia, Cincinnati, and Phoenix.4

These reports may reflect some of your experiences: We know many of you are treating clients addicted to OxyContin.

OxyContin has been heralded as a miracle drug that allows patients with chronic pain to resume a normal life. It has also been called pharmaceutical heroin and is thought to have been responsible for a number of deaths and robberies in areas where its abuse has been reported. Patients who legitimately use OxyContin fear that the continuing controversy will mean tighter restrictions on the medication. Those who abuse OxyContin reportedly go to great lengths—legal or illegal—to obtain the powerful drug.

At the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT), we are not interested in fueling the controversy about the use or abuse of OxyContin. As the Federal Government’s focal point for addiction treatment information, CSAT is instead interested in helping professionals on the front line of substance abuse treatment by providing you with the facts about OxyContin, its use and abuse, and how to treat individuals who present at your treatment facility with OxyContin concerns. Perhaps these individuals are taking medically prescribed OxyContin to manage pain and are concerned about their physical dependence on the medication. Perhaps you are faced with a young adult who thought that OxyContin was a “safe” recreational drug because, after all, doctors prescribe it. Possibly changes in the availability or quality of illicit opioid drugs in your community have led to abuse of and addiction to OxyContin.

Whatever the reason, OxyContin is being abused, and people are becoming addicted. And in many instances, these people are young adults unaware of the dangers of OxyContin. Many of these individuals mix OxyContin with alcohol and drugs, and the result is all too often tragic.

Abuse of prescription drugs is not a new phenomenon. You have undoubtedly heard about abuse of Percocet®, hydrocodone, and a host of other medications. What sets OxyContin abuse apart is the potency of the drug. Treatment providers in affected areas say that they were unprepared for the speed with which an OxyContin “epidemic” developed in their communities.

We at CSAT want to make sure that you are prepared if OxyContin abuse becomes a problem in your community. This revised issue of the original Substance Abuse Treatment Advisory on OxyContin will help prepare you by

• Answering frequently asked questions about OxyContin
• Providing you with general information about semisynthetic opioids and their addiction potential
• Summarizing evidence-based protocols for treatment
• Providing you with resources for further information

For more information about OxyContin abuse and treatment, see our resource boxes and end of this document. Feel free to copy the information in the Substance Abuse Treatment Advisory and share it with colleagues so that they, too, can have the most current information about this critically important topic.

OxyContin® Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is OxyContin?

A: OxyContin is a semisynthetic opioid analgesic prescribed for chronic or long-lasting pain. The medication’s active ingredient is oxycodone, which is also found in drugs like Percodan® and Tylox®. However, OxyContin contains between 10 and 80 milligrams (mg) of oxycodone in a timed-release tablet. Painkillers such as Tylox contain 5 mg of oxycodone and often require repeated doses to bring about pain relief because they lack the timed-release formulation.

Q: How is OxyContin used?

A: OxyContin, also referred to as “Oxy,” “O.C.,” and “Oxycotton” on the street, is legitimately prescribed as a timed-release tablet, providing as many as 12 hours of relief from chronic pain. It is often prescribed for cancer patients or those with chronic, long-lasting back pain. The benefit of the medication to people who suffer from chronic pain is that they generally need to take the pill only twice a day, whereas a dosage of another medication would require more frequent use to control the pain. The goal of chronic pain treatment is to decrease pain and improve function.

Q: How is OxyContin abused?

A: People who abuse OxyContin either crush the tablet and ingest or snort it or dilute it in water and inject it. Crushing or diluting the tablet disarms the timed-release action of the medication and causes a quick, powerful high. Those who abuse OxyContin have compared this feeling to the euphoria they experience when taking heroin. In fact, in some areas, the use of heroin is overshadowed by the abuse of OxyContin.

Purdue Pharma, OxyContin’s manufacturer, has taken steps to reduce the potential for abuse of OxyContin and other pain medications. Its Web site lists the following initiatives: funding educational programs to teach healthcare professionals how to assess and treat patients suffering from pain, providing prescribers with tamper-proof prescription pads, developing and distributing more than 1 million brochures to pharmacists and healthcare professionals to help educate them about medication diversion, working with healthcare and law enforcement officials to address prescription drug abuse, and endorsing the development of State and national prescription drug monitoring programs to detect diversion. In addition, the company is attempting to research and develop other pain management products that will be more resistant to abuse and diversion. The company estimates that it will take significant time for such products to be brought to market. For more information, visit Purdue Pharma’s Web site at www.purduepharma.com or call the company at 203–588–8069.

Q: How does OxyContin abuse differ from abuse of other pain prescriptions?

A: Abuse of prescription pain medications is not new. Two primary factors, however, set OxyContin abuse apart from other prescription drug abuse. First, OxyContin is a powerful drug that contains a much larger amount of the active ingredient, oxycodone, than other prescription pain relievers. By crushing the tablet and either ingesting or snorting it, or by injecting diluted OxyContin, people who abuse the opioid feel its powerful effects in a short time, rather than over a 12-hour span. Second, great profits can be made in the illegal sale of OxyContin. A 40-mg pill costs approximately $4 by prescription, yet it may sell for $20 to $40 on the street, depending on the area of the country in which the drug is sold.5

OxyContin can be comparatively inexpensive if it is legitimately prescribed and if its cost is covered by insurance. However, the National Drug Intelligence Center reports that people who abuse OxyContin may use heroin if their insurance will no longer pay for their OxyContin prescription because heroin is less expensive than OxyContin that is purchased illegally.6

Q: Why are so many crimes reportedly associated with OxyContin abuse?

A: Many reports of OxyContin abuse have occurred in rural areas that have housed labor-intensive industries, such as logging or coal mining. These industries are often located in economically depressed areas, as well. Therefore, people for whom the drug may have been legitimately prescribed may be tempted to sell their prescriptions for profit. Substance abuse treatment providers say that the addiction is so strong that people will go to great lengths to get the drug, including robbing pharmacies and writing false prescriptions.

Q: What is the likelihood that a person for whom OxyContin is prescribed will become addicted?

A: Most people who take OxyContin as prescribed do not become addicted. The National Institute on Drug Abuse reports: “Long-term use [of opioids] can lead to physical dependence—the body adapts to the presence of the substance and withdrawal symptoms occur if use is reduced abruptly. This can also include tolerance, which means that higher doses of a medication must be taken to obtain the same initial effects. . . . Studies have shown that properly managed medical use of opioid analgesic compounds is safe and rarely causes addiction. Taken exactly as prescribed, opioids can be used to manage pain effectively.”7

One review found, “A multitude of studies indicate that the rate of opioid addiction in populations of chronic pain sufferers is similar to the rate of opioid addiction within the general population, falling in the range of 1 to 2 percent or less.”8

In short, most individuals who are prescribed OxyContin, or any other opioid, will not become addicted, although they may become dependent on the drug and will need to be withdrawn by a qualified physician. Individuals who are taking the drug as prescribed should continue to do so, as long as they and their physician agree that taking the drug is a medically appropriate way for them to manage pain.

Q: How can I determine whether a person who uses OxyContin is dependent on rather than addicted to OxyContin?

A: When pain patients take an opioid analgesic as directed, or to the point where their pain is adequately controlled, it is not abuse or addiction. Abuse occurs when patients take more than is needed for pain control, especially if they take it to get high. Patients who take their medication in a manner that grossly differs from a physician’s directions are probably abusing that drug.

If a patient continues to seek excessive pain medication after pain management is achieved, the patient may be addicted. Addiction is characterized by the repeated, compulsive use of a substance despite adverse social, psychological, and/or physical consequences. Addiction is often (but not always) accompanied by physical dependence, withdrawal syndrome, and tolerance. Physical dependence is defined as a physiologic state of adaptation to a substance. The absence of this substance produces symptoms and signs of withdrawal. Withdrawal syndrome is often characterized by overactivity of the physiological functions that were suppressed by the drug and/or depression of the functions that were stimulated by the drug. Opioids often cause sleepiness, calmness, and constipation, so opioid withdrawal often includes insomnia, anxiety, and diarrhea.

Pain patients, however, may sometimes develop a physical dependence during treatment with opioids. This is not an addiction. A gradual decrease of the medication dose over time, as the pain is resolving, brings the former pain patient to a drug-free state without any craving for repeated doses of the drug. This is the difference between the patient treated for pain who was formerly dependent and has now been withdrawn from medication and the patient who is opioid addicted: The patient addicted to diverted pharmaceutical opioids continues to have a severe and uncontrollable craving that almost always leads to eventual relapse in the absence of adequate treatment. This uncontrollable craving for another “rush” of the drug differentiates the patient who is “detoxified” but opioid addicted from the former pain patient. Theoretically, a person who abuses opioids might develop a physical dependence but obtain treatment in the first few months of abuse, before becoming addicted. In this case, supervised withdrawal (detoxification) followed by a few months of abstinence-oriented treatment might be sufficient for the patient who is not addicted who abuses opioids. If, however, this patient subsequently relapses to opioid abuse, then that behavior would support a diagnosis of opioid addiction. If the patient has several relapses to opioid abuse, he or she will require long-term treatment for the opioid addiction. (See the section titled Treatment and Detoxification Protocols to learn more about treatment options.)

Q: I work at a facility that does not use medication-assisted treatment. What treatment should I provide to individuals addicted to or dependent on OxyContin?

A: The majority of U.S. treatment facilities do not offer medication-assisted treatment. However, because of the strength of OxyContin and its powerful addiction potential, medical complications may be increased by quickly withdrawing individuals from the drug. Premature withdrawal may cause individuals to seek heroin, and the quality of that heroin will not be known. In addition, these individuals, if injecting heroin, may also expose themselves to HIV and hepatitis. Most people addicted to OxyContin need medication-assisted treatment. Even if individuals have been taking OxyContin legitimately to manage pain, they should not stop taking the drug all at once. Instead, their dosages should be tapered down until medication is no longer needed. If you work in a drug-free or abstinence-based treatment facility, it is important to refer patients to facilities where they can receive appropriate treatment. (See SAMHSA Resources.)

Treatment and Detoxification Protocols

OxyContin® is a powerful drug that contains a much larger amount of the active ingredient, oxycodone, than other prescription opioid pain relievers. Whereas most people who take OxyContin as prescribed do not become addicted, those who abuse their pain medication or obtain it illegally may find themselves becoming rapidly dependent on, if not addicted to, the drug.

Two types of treatment have been documented as most effective for opioid addiction. One is a long-term, residential, therapeutic community type of treatment, and the other is long-term, medication-assisted outpatient treatment. Clinical trials using medications to treat opioid addiction have generally included subjects addicted to diverted pharmaceutical opioids as well as to illicit heroin. Therefore, there is no medical reason to suppose that the patient addicted to diverted pharmaceutical opioids is any less likely to benefit from medication-assisted treatment than the patient addicted to heroin.

Some patients who are opioid addicted who have very good social supports may occasionally be able to benefit from antagonist treatment with naltrexone. This treatment works best if the patient is highly motivated to participate in treatment and has undergone adequate detoxification from the opioid of abuse. Most patients who are opioid addicted in outpatient therapy, however, do best with medication that is either an agonist or a partial agonist. Methadone is the agonist medication most commonly prescribed for opioid addiction treatment in this country. Buprenorphine is the only partial agonist approved by the Food and Drug Administration for opioid addiction treatment.

The guidelines for treating OxyContin addiction or dependence are basically no different than the guidelines the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT) uses for treating addiction to or dependence on any opioid. However, because OxyContin contains higher dose levels of opioid than are typically found in other oxycodone-containing pain medications, higher dosages of methadone or buprenorphine may be needed to appropriately treat patients who abuse OxyContin.

Methadone or buprenorphine may be used for OxyContin addiction treatment or, for that matter, treatment for addiction to any other opioid, including the semisynthetic opioids. Medication-assisted treatment for prescription opioid abuse is not a new treatment approach. For instance, in 2002, Alaska estimated that 15,000 people abused prescription opioids in the State and that most patients receiving methadone were not addicted to heroin. In addition, a significant percentage of patients in publicly supported methadone programs were not being treated for heroin addiction but for abuse of semisynthetic opioids (e.g., hydrocodone). The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Drug Abuse Warning Network emergency room data show that both oxycodone and hydrocodone mentions increased dramatically in the United States between 1995 and 2002.9 And when Arkansas opened its first methadone maintenance clinic in December 1993, the vast majority of its clients were not admitted for heroin addiction but for semisynthetic opioid abuse. These individuals had been traveling to other States for treatment because methadone treatment was not available near their homes.

Using the criteria above describing the difference between addiction to and dependence on OxyContin, you may be able to determine whether a patient requires treatment for opioid addiction. If this is the case, methadone or buprenorphine may be used for withdrawal. For certain patient populations, including those with many treatment failures, methadone or buprenorphine is the treatment of choice.10

“As substance abuse treatment professionals, we have the responsibility for learning as much as we can about OxyContin and then providing appropriate treatment for people addicted to it. Appropriate treatment will nearly always involve prescribing methadone, buprenorphine, or, in some cases, naltrexone,” says H. Westley Clark, M.D., J.D., Director of CSAT. “Programs that do not offer medication-assisted treatment will need to refer patients who are addicted to OxyContin to programs that do,” he adds.

It is important to assess an individual’s eligibility for medication-assisted treatment with methadone or buprenorphine to determine whether he or she is eligible for this type of treatment and whether it would be appropriate. The assessment may take place in a hospital emergency department, central intake unit, or similar place. Final assessment of an individual’s eligibility for medication-assisted treatment must be completed by treatment program staff. The preliminary assessment should include the following areas:11

• Determining the need for emergency care
• Diagnosing the presence and severity of opioid dependence
• Determining the extent of alcohol and drug abuse
• Screening for co-occurring medical and psychiatric conditions
• Evaluating an individual’s living situation, family and social problems, and legal problems

“. . . we have the responsibility for learning as much as we can about OxyContin, and then providing appropriate treatment for people who are addicted to it.”

H. Westley Clark, M.D., J.D., M.P.H., CAS, FASAM
Director, CSAT

Treatment Improvement Protocols (TIPs) and Collateral Products Addressing Opioid Addiction Treatment

TIP 40 Clinical Guidelines for the Use of Buprenorphine in the Treatment of Opioid Addiction BKD500

Quick Guide for Physicians Based on TIP 40: Clinical Guidelines for the Use of Buprenorphine in the Treatment of Opioid Addiction QGPT40

KAP Keys for Physicians Based on TIP 40: Clinical Guidelines for the Use of Buprenorphine in the Treatment of Opioid Addiction KAPT40

TIP 43 Medication-Assisted Treatment for Opioid Addiction in Opioid Treatment Programs BKD524

Quick Guide for Clinicians Based on TIP 43: Medication-Assisted Treatment for Opioid Addiction in Opioid Treatment Programs QGCT43

KAP Keys for Clinicians Based on TIP 43: Medication-Assisted Treatment for Opioid Addiction in Opioid Treatment Programs KAPT43

SAMHSA Resources

To find a substance abuse treatment facility near you, visit the Substance Abuse Treatment Facility Locator at www.findtreatment.samhsa.gov. Call the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Substance Abuse Treatment Hotline at 800–662–HELP for substance abuse treatment referral information.

For More Information About Treatment for Opioid Addiction

Sign up for SAMHSA’s Information Mailing System (SIMS) to receive information about the following topics:

• Grant announcements
• Funding opportunities such as competitive contract announcements
• Prevention materials and publications
• Treatment- and provider-oriented materials and publications
• Research findings and reports
• Announcements of available research data sets
• Policy announcements and materials

To sign up for this free service, use one of the following methods to contact SIMS:

Web: http://sims.health.org
Mail: SAMHSA’s National Clearinghouse for Alcohol and Drug Information (NCADI)
Attn: Mailing List Manager
P.O. Box 2345
Rockville, MD 20847–2345
Phone: 800–729–6686
Fax: 301–468–6433
Attn: Mailing List Manager

Three Ways To Obtain Free Copies of All CSAT Products:

1. Call SAMHSA’s NCADI at 800–729–6686; TDD (hearing impaired) 800–487–4889
2. Visit NCADI’s Web site, www.ncadi.samhsa.gov
3. Access TIPs on line at www.kap.samhsa.gov


Substance Abuse Treatment Advisory

Substance Abuse Treatment Advisory—published on an as-needed basis for treatment providers—was written and produced under contract number 270-04-7049 by the Knowledge Application Program (KAP), a Joint Venture of JBS International, Inc., and The CDM Group, Inc., for the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of SAMHSA or HHS.

Public Domain Notice: All material in this report is in the public domain and may be reproduced or copied without permission; citation of the source is appreciated. However, this publication may not be reproduced or distributed for a fee without the specific, written authorization of the Office of Communications, SAMHSA, HHS.

Electronic Access and Copies of Publication: This publication can be accessed electronically through the Internet at www.kap.samhsa.gov. Additional free print copies can be ordered from SAMHSA’s National Clearinghouse for Alcohol and Drug Information at 800–729–6686.

Recommended Citation: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. “OxyContin®: Prescription Drug Abuse—2006 Revision.” Substance Abuse Treatment Advisory, Volume 5, Issue 1. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, April 2006.

DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 06-4138
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Printed 2006

Notes

1. WISC-TV. OxyContin: The Good, The Bad, The Deadly. Broadcast transcript. Madison, WI: WISC-TV, February 14, 2006. www.channel3000.com/health/7013912/detail.html [accessed March 2, 2006].
2. Crane, J.P. Drug use by young raises flag. The Boston Globe, February 5, 2006. www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2006/02/05/drug_use_by_young_raises_flag [accessed March 2, 2006].
3. Hammack, L. Painkiller prescriptions up significantly in region. The Roanoke Times, March 28, 2004. www.roanoke.com/roatimes/news/story164817.html [accessed March 2, 2006].
4. Reuters. Powerful painkillers fueling U.S. crime rate. Redmond, WA: MSNBC.com., March 10, 2005. www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7141313 [accessed March 2, 2006].
5. National Drug Intelligence Center. Intelligence Bulletin: OxyContin Diversion, Availability, and Abuse. Johnstown, PA: National Drug Intelligence Center, U.S. Department of Justice, August 2004. www.usdoj.gov/ndic/pubs10/10550/10550p.pdf [accessed March 3, 2006].
6. National Drug Intelligence Center. Pharmaceuticals. In: National Drug Threat Assessment 2004. Johnstown, PA: National Drug Intelligence Center, U.S. Department of Justice, April 2004. www.usdoj.gov/ndic/pubs8/8731/8731p.pdf [accessed March 3, 2006].
7. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). NIDA Infofacts: Prescription Pain and Other Medications. Washington, DC: NIDA, National Institutes of Health, 2005. www.drugabuse.gov/infofacts/PainMed.html [accessed March 3, 2006].
8. Fisher, F.B. Interpretation of “aberrant” drug-related behaviors. Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons 9(1):25–28, 2004.
9. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Emergency Department Trends From the Drug Abuse Warning Network: Final Estimates 1995–2002. DAWN Series D-24. DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 03-3780. Rockville, MD: SAMHSA, 2003. dawninfo.samhsa.gov/old_dawn/pubs_94_02/edpubs/2002final [accessed March 2, 2006].
10. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. Detoxification and Substance Abuse Treatment. Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series 45. DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 06-4131. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2006.
11. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. Initial screening, admission procedures, and assessment techniques. In: Medication-Assisted Treatment for Opioid Addiction in Opioid Treatment Programs. Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series 43. DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 05-4048. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2005, pp. 43–61.

Certification and Licensure Issues Related to the Treatment of Co-occurring Disorders

Certification and Licensure Issues Related to the Treatment of Co-occurring Disorders.SAMHSA’S Co-Occurring Center for Excellence (COCE)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 2
Overview• Purpose of licensure and certification for professionals is to protect the public and ensure that practitioners have meet standards for practice.• Purpose of licensure and accreditation of programs is to ensure that they meet state regulations and/or national operating standards and also protect the public.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 3
Licensure and Certification of Professionals – Key Definitions• Licensure: A license is a property right of an individual and as a property right a license is backed by the laws of the State in which it is granted. (Shimberg &Roederer, 1994) “…it is illegal for a person to practice a profession without meeting standards imposed by the State.” (Schoon & Smith, 2000)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 4
Licensure and Certification of Professionals - Key Definitions• Certification: A process established by a private sector body that defines standards for professional practice. It may prohibit the use of a title or designation but often does not restrict someone from practicing a profession. (Schoon & Smith 2000)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 5
Licensure and Certification of Professionals – Key Definitions• Difference between licensure and certification is that certification is voluntary, not overseen by a governmental body and usually does not prohibit someone from practicing• Some states use the term “certified to indicate a license-e.g. “certified independent social worker” instead of “licensed independent social worker
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 6
Purpose of Licensure and Certification• Provides assurance that practitioners– have met standards of practice – Can perform scope of practice established for the profession– Have demonstrated knowledge and skill to practice• Provides protection from incompetent and unscrupulous professionals
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 7
Current Scopes of Practice and Core Competencies• Scopes of Practice for social workers, psychologists and psychiatrists include assessment, diagnosis, treatment of mental, emotional and behavioral disorders • The scopes of practice for psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers, mental health counselors, and marriage and family therapists also include addiction treatment • However, pre-service education for these disciplines contains little content on addictions
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 8
Specialty Credentials• Specialty credentials in addictions exist for psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers and licensed professional counselors• Fewer than 7 percent of practitioners hold these national credentials (Harwood, et al, in press)• Some States (e.g.CT, IL, PA) have developed or are in the process of developing specialty credentials in COD but they are generally for addiction counselors
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 9
Specialty Credentials Requirements• Mental Health Practitioners need to know the Transdisciplinary Foundations as described in the Addiction Counseling Competencies (CSAT 1998)– Understanding Addictions (models & theories; behavioral, psychological, physical health and social effects of psychoactive substances)– Treatment knowledge (continuum of care; importance of social, family and other support systems; understanding and application of research; interdisciplinary approach to treatment– Application to Practice (Understanding of diagnostic and placement criteria; understanding of variety of helping strategies– Professional Readiness (Understanding of diverse cultures; disabilities
MFT and LCSW Continuing Education Requirements --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 10
Specialty Credentials• For addiction counselors providing COD treatment the domains that have been identified include:– Assessment/evaluation/diagnosis– Clinical Competence– Case Management– Pharmacology and medical issues– Systems Integration– Professional Responsibility (IAODAPCA 2002)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 11
Benefits and Risks Related to Specialty Credentials• Enhance competencies of practitioners in providing services to clients with COD • Integrates COD services into practice• Specialty credentials are voluntary and not required for those providing COD services• Lack of pre-service education in COD may preclude effective screening, assessment, intervention and referrals for COD clients
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 12
Elements of a COD Certification• Need comprehensive understanding of substance abuse & mental disorders– Remission– Recovery– Resilience• Competencies should include integrated assessment, engagement, integrated treatment planning and treatment, and long term integrated treatment methods (CSAT 2005)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 13
Benefits and Risks of a COD Credential• Currently a specialty credential for COD practice exists mainly for substance abuse professionals in several states• Other disciplines have an addiction certification• Advantage of developing a national COD credential is the creation of a scope of practice and competencies specifically designed for working with COD clients• Risk is further splintering of the field and concerns that all patients would be perceived as needing COD treatment
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 14
Program Accreditation and Licensure• Accreditation is a voluntary performance-based process used to assess an organization or institution based on established quality and safety standards. Surveyors are carefully trained to conduct the evaluation; funders and third party payors usually require accreditation of institutions and agencies
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 15
Program Accreditation and Licensure• Licensure is a right or permission granted by the state to engage in a business, perform an act or engage in a transaction that would be unlawful with such a right or permission (Merriam-Webster 1996) • States regulate the licensing of programs & hospitals; regulations may include policies, procedures, types of staff, facility safety standards and types of care specific programs can offer
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 16
Core Capabilities for Programs Serving COD Clients• Following services are needed:– Integrated screening and assessment– Staged interventions– Assertive Outreach– Motivational interventions– Simultaneous Interventions– Risk Reduction– Tailored mental health and substance abuse treatment– Counseling– Social Support Interventions– Longitudinal view of remission and recovery– Cultural sensitivity and competence (CSAT 2005)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 17
Current Issues Regarding State Licensure of Programs• COD programs need to have appropriately trained & certified/licensed staff; comprehensive services including a full array of mental health and substance abuse treatment; supportive services; and implementation of evidence-based practices• Most programs are licensed by State mental health and substance abuse agencies respectively: funding streams are separate; different data collection systems; different staffing patterns; distinct service requirements
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 18
Models of Licensure Standards for COD Programs • Comprehensive Continuous Integrated System of Care (CCISC) model is being implemented in several states (CSAT 2005)• CCISC integrates mental health and substance abuse systems to provide a comprehensive system of care including policies, financing, programs, clinical practices and basic clinician competencies (Minkoff 2003; CSAT 2005)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 19
Benefits of Licensure and Accreditation for COD Programs• Elimination of many obstacles that currently exist• Programs would be able to screen and assess for COD and some could be designated as programs to provide enhanced services• Programs that wish to specialize in COD treatment could be recognized• National accreditation would create consistent standards for programs including administrative, staffing and programmatic
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 20
Issues and Future Direction• Little research exists on whether licensed/certified clinicians have better outcomes than those not certified• Though competencies in substance abuse are being added to practice standards few curricula provide adequate education or training• Evidence-based practices for COD treatment need to be incorporated into education and training standards• State program licensure practices still make programs providing COD treatment jump through a maze of regulations• JCAHO has not yet established national standards for dual diagnosis programs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 21
References• American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy Core Competency Taskforce. (2004) The MFT Core Competencies, Alexandria, VA: AAMFT• Association of Social Work Boards. Model social work practice act. www.aswb.org/Model_law.pdf• Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards. The practice of psychology. www.asppb.org/exam/practice.asp• Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. 2005. Substance Abuse Treatment for Persons with Co- occurring Disorders. Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series 42. DHHS Publication No (SMA) 05-3992. Rockville, MD: SAMHSA
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 22
References• Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (1998). Addiction Counseling Competencies: The Knowledge, Skills and Attitudes of Professional Practice. Technical Assistance Publication Series No. 21. DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 98-3171. Rockville, MD: SAMHSA• Harwood, H.J., Kowalski, J., and Ameen, A. (In press). Training on substance abuse of behavioral health professionals. Falls Church, VA: The Lewin Group• Illinois Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Professional Certification Association. (2002). Mental Illness/Substance Abuse Professional Role Delineation Study. www.iaodapca.org.• Merriwam-Webster. (1996) Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary of Law. Springfield MA: Merriam-Webster.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 23
References• Minkoff, K. (2003). Comprehensive, continuous, integrated system of care model description. http://www.zialogic.org/CCISC.htm.• Schoon, C.G. & Smith, I.L. (2000). The licensure and certification mission. In C.G. Schoon and I.L. Smith (Eds.) The licensure and certification mission: Legal, social and political foundations (pp1-3). New York: Professional Examination Services.• Shimberg, B. & Roederer, (1994). Questions a legislator should ask. Lexington, KY: The Council on Licensure, Enforcement and Regulation.• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (2003).Strategies for developing treatment programs for people with co- occurring substance abuse and mental disorders.DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 03-3782. Rockville, MD: SAMHSA• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2002) Report to Congress on the prevention and treatment of co-occurring substance abuse disorders and mental disorders. http://als.samshsa.gov/reports/congress2002/CoOccurringRPT.pdf.SAMHSA’S Co-Occurring Center for Excellence (COCE)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 2
Overview• Purpose of licensure and certification for professionals is to protect the public and ensure that practitioners have meet standards for practice.• Purpose of licensure and accreditation of programs is to ensure that they meet state regulations and/or national operating standards and also protect the public.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 3
Licensure and Certification of Professionals – Key Definitions• Licensure: A license is a property right of an individual and as a property right a license is backed by the laws of the State in which it is granted. (Shimberg &Roederer, 1994) “…it is illegal for a person to practice a profession without meeting standards imposed by the State.” (Schoon & Smith, 2000)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 4
Licensure and Certification of Professionals - Key Definitions• Certification: A process established by a private sector body that defines standards for professional practice. It may prohibit the use of a title or designation but often does not restrict someone from practicing a profession. (Schoon & Smith 2000)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 5
Licensure and Certification of Professionals – Key Definitions• Difference between licensure and certification is that certification is voluntary, not overseen by a governmental body and usually does not prohibit someone from practicing• Some states use the term “certified to indicate a license-e.g. “certified independent social worker” instead of “licensed independent social worker
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 6
Purpose of Licensure and Certification• Provides assurance that practitioners– have met standards of practice – Can perform scope of practice established for the profession– Have demonstrated knowledge and skill to practice• Provides protection from incompetent and unscrupulous professionals
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 7
Current Scopes of Practice and Core Competencies• Scopes of Practice for social workers, psychologists and psychiatrists include assessment, diagnosis, treatment of mental, emotional and behavioral disorders • The scopes of practice for psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers, mental health counselors, and marriage and family therapists also include addiction treatment • However, pre-service education for these disciplines contains little content on addictions
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 8
Specialty Credentials• Specialty credentials in addictions exist for psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers and licensed professional counselors• Fewer than 7 percent of practitioners hold these national credentials (Harwood, et al, in press)• Some States (e.g.CT, IL, PA) have developed or are in the process of developing specialty credentials in COD but they are generally for addiction counselors
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 9
Specialty Credentials Requirements• Mental Health Practitioners need to know the Transdisciplinary Foundations as described in the Addiction Counseling Competencies (CSAT 1998)– Understanding Addictions (models & theories; behavioral, psychological, physical health and social effects of psychoactive substances)– Treatment knowledge (continuum of care; importance of social, family and other support systems; understanding and application of research; interdisciplinary approach to treatment– Application to Practice (Understanding of diagnostic and placement criteria; understanding of variety of helping strategies– Professional Readiness (Understanding of diverse cultures; disabilities
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 10
Specialty Credentials• For addiction counselors providing COD treatment the domains that have been identified include:– Assessment/evaluation/diagnosis– Clinical Competence– Case Management– Pharmacology and medical issues– Systems Integration– Professional Responsibility (IAODAPCA 2002)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 11
Benefits and Risks Related to Specialty Credentials• Enhance competencies of practitioners in providing services to clients with COD • Integrates COD services into practice• Specialty credentials are voluntary and not required for those providing COD services• Lack of pre-service education in COD may preclude effective screening, assessment, intervention and referrals for COD clients
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 12
Elements of a COD Certification• Need comprehensive understanding of substance abuse & mental disorders– Remission– Recovery– Resilience• Competencies should include integrated assessment, engagement, integrated treatment planning and treatment, and long term integrated treatment methods (CSAT 2005)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 13
Benefits and Risks of a COD Credential• Currently a specialty credential for COD practice exists mainly for substance abuse professionals in several states• Other disciplines have an addiction certification• Advantage of developing a national COD credential is the creation of a scope of practice and competencies specifically designed for working with COD clients• Risk is further splintering of the field and concerns that all patients would be perceived as needing COD treatment
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 14
Program Accreditation and Licensure• Accreditation is a voluntary performance-based process used to assess an organization or institution based on established quality and safety standards. Surveyors are carefully trained to conduct the evaluation; funders and third party payors usually require accreditation of institutions and agencies
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 15
Program Accreditation and Licensure• Licensure is a right or permission granted by the state to engage in a business, perform an act or engage in a transaction that would be unlawful with such a right or permission (Merriam-Webster 1996) • States regulate the licensing of programs & hospitals; regulations may include policies, procedures, types of staff, facility safety standards and types of care specific programs can offer
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 16
Core Capabilities for Programs Serving COD Clients• Following services are needed:– Integrated screening and assessment– Staged interventions– Assertive Outreach– Motivational interventions– Simultaneous Interventions– Risk Reduction– Tailored mental health and substance abuse treatment– Counseling– Social Support Interventions– Longitudinal view of remission and recovery– Cultural sensitivity and competence (CSAT 2005)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 17
Current Issues Regarding State Licensure of Programs• COD programs need to have appropriately trained & certified/licensed staff; comprehensive services including a full array of mental health and substance abuse treatment; supportive services; and implementation of evidence-based practices• Most programs are licensed by State mental health and substance abuse agencies respectively: funding streams are separate; different data collection systems; different staffing patterns; distinct service requirements
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 18
Models of Licensure Standards for COD Programs • Comprehensive Continuous Integrated System of Care (CCISC) model is being implemented in several states (CSAT 2005)• CCISC integrates mental health and substance abuse systems to provide a comprehensive system of care including policies, financing, programs, clinical practices and basic clinician competencies (Minkoff 2003; CSAT 2005)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 19
Benefits of Licensure and Accreditation for COD Programs• Elimination of many obstacles that currently exist• Programs would be able to screen and assess for COD and some could be designated as programs to provide enhanced services• Programs that wish to specialize in COD treatment could be recognized• National accreditation would create consistent standards for programs including administrative, staffing and programmatic
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 20
Issues and Future Direction• Little research exists on whether licensed/certified clinicians have better outcomes than those not certified• Though competencies in substance abuse are being added to practice standards few curricula provide adequate education or training• Evidence-based practices for COD treatment need to be incorporated into education and training standards• State program licensure practices still make programs providing COD treatment jump through a maze of regulations• JCAHO has not yet established national standards for dual diagnosis programs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 21
References• American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy Core Competency Taskforce. (2004) The MFT Core Competencies, Alexandria, VA: AAMFT• Association of Social Work Boards. Model social work practice act. www.aswb.org/Model_law.pdf• Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards. The practice of psychology. www.asppb.org/exam/practice.asp• Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. 2005. Substance Abuse Treatment for Persons with Co- occurring Disorders. Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series 42. DHHS Publication No (SMA) 05-3992. Rockville, MD: SAMHSA
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 22
References• Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (1998). Addiction Counseling Competencies: The Knowledge, Skills and Attitudes of Professional Practice. Technical Assistance Publication Series No. 21. DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 98-3171. Rockville, MD: SAMHSA• Harwood, H.J., Kowalski, J., and Ameen, A. (In press). Training on substance abuse of behavioral health professionals. Falls Church, VA: The Lewin Group• Illinois Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Professional Certification Association. (2002). Mental Illness/Substance Abuse Professional Role Delineation Study. www.iaodapca.org.• Merriwam-Webster. (1996) Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary of Law. Springfield MA: Merriam-Webster.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 23
References• Minkoff, K. (2003). Comprehensive, continuous, integrated system of care model description. http://www.zialogic.org/CCISC.htm.• Schoon, C.G. & Smith, I.L. (2000). The licensure and certification mission. In C.G. Schoon and I.L. Smith (Eds.) The licensure and certification mission: Legal, social and political foundations (pp1-3). New York: Professional Examination Services.• Shimberg, B. & Roederer, (1994). Questions a legislator should ask. Lexington, KY: The Council on Licensure, Enforcement and Regulation.• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (2003).Strategies for developing treatment programs for people with co- occurring substance abuse and mental disorders.DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 03-3782. Rockville, MD: SAMHSA• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2002) Report to Congress on the prevention and treatment of co-occurring substance abuse disorders and mental disorders. http://als.samshsa.gov/reports/congress2002/CoOccurringRPT.pdf.

How to Cheer Yourself Up When Youre Down

Got the colder weather, sour relationshops, no money, poor health, plain ol' down 'n dirty blues? Try some of these strategies to blow away those dark clouds and let the sunshine into your life again.

1) Dance! Put on your favourite music, turn it up loud and dance! This is guaranteed to make you feel good. If you are unable to dance, don't let that stop you having fun - sing at the top of your voice instead.

2) Smile! Force yourself to smile even if you don't feel like it. This tricks your brain into thinking that you are happy. You do want to be happy don't you? Okay then - a great big cheesy grin. After three, one, two, three, - smile :0)

3) Spend time with children. Their natural zest for life is infectious. As well as the pleasures of a spontaneous hug or a chubby little hand in yours, try to take away with you some of their joy in simple things, licking an ice cream, playing with water, tramping through fallen leaves or following a butterfly.

4) Reward yourself. If there is a job that you hate to do, household accounts, home repairs etc. don't keep putting it off so that it is constantly nagging at you. Just get it done. Then reward yourself with whatever you love, a shiny new magazine, a bunch of flowers, a long soak in an aromatic bath, two bars of chocolate or an evening in front of the tv doing absolutely nothing. Or even all of the above if you can afford it. The peace of mind that comes from having got the job done will be the greatest reward of all.

5) Clear out your clutter. The ancient art of Feng Shui believes that getting rid of clutter rids your home or work space of negative stuck energy and allows space for positive energy to surge into all aspects of your life. Whether or not this is correct, it is an undeniable fact that clearing out what you no longer want or need makes life easier. Your home is neater, looks more spacious and is easier to clean. There can also be a tremendous feeling of freedom as you let go of the past and trust in the future to bring you what you will need. Emotional clutter can be even more damaging. We've all said or done things we regret, the trick is to do anything you can to repair the damage and if that is not possible, forgive yourself and toss it out of your life.

6) Take action. If something is worrying you, be it a health problem, or debt or divorce, make that doctor's appointment, get some debt counselling, find out your rights. The reality is often less stressful than sitting alone worrying about it. Try to talk over your problems with a friend, or if that is impossible find a support group on the Internet by typing debt, divorce or whatever into a search engine.

7) Positive thoughts. When you leave the house each morning, say and mean, I'm going to have a great day, it's going to be lots of fun, rather than thinking Oh no, another dreary day at the office to get through. The first attitude will attract good vibrations and positive fun people to you, the second will ensure a depressing day.

8) Have more fun. Apparently children laugh approximately 400 times a day yet adults laugh only about 20 times a day. When do we lose our sense of fun? Claim it back. Play games, watch comedies, have daily jokes delivered to your mailbox or throw a fancy dress party.

9) Make something. Being creative gives you such a buzz you won't stay down in the dumps for long. Stencil a room, make a cake, plan a garden, sketch or paint a picture. Express yourself with a modern collage, change your rooms around, display your collections or start a patchwork quilt.

10) Keep a gratitude journal. Write down half a dozen things every day that you are grateful for, from waking up and seeing your children's beautiful little faces to the smell of the roses in the local park. This cannot fail to cheer you up if you do it regularly as it gives you a whole new way of experiencing your life.

11) Start a new project. Learn a language, trace your family history, redecorate your home, learn to ride a horse, gain a new qualification, take music lessons, learn to make your own soft furnishings or do your own auto repairs. Visualize yourself successfully completing the project and the benefits it will bring to your life. Then make a start and follow it through to the end. An added bonus will be the increased self esteem that comes from having planned, problem solved and perfected the whole project yourself.

12) See your old friends. It's easy to get into a work, family, housework, shopping, sleep and back to work again routine that leaves you no time at all to be the person you once were. The funny, up for a laugh, outgoing young woman you used to be. Spending time with friends who knew the old you seems to resurrect that side of your character. You will come away feeling younger, more positive and more excited by life than you were before you met up. Go on, invite them over to share a pizza and catch up on each other's lives.

13) Paint or accessorize a room that you spend a lot of time in a lovely bright yellow. The colour of sunshine will lift your spirit and bring positive vibrations. We subconciously know about the effects of colour on our emotions which is why we talk about the future looking rosy or having the blues.

14) Take the happiness option. You have the choice whether to spend this day, which you will never live through again, in a state of happiness or unhappiness. Choose to spend it as happily as you possibly can.

Continuing Education for Marriage and Family Therapists, Social Workers, & Licensed Professional Counselors

Continuing Education for Marriage and Family Therapists, Social Workers, Licensed Professional Counselors, and other Human Service Providers nationwide

Aspira Continuing Education Offers

Refer a Colleague and get Free CEUs!
When you refer a colleague to Aspira, simply ask them to enter a code of "REFERRAL" when they check out. In order for you to get the credit, though, they will need to know the email address you signed up with and enter it when prompted.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Save Money when you buy an Annual Subscription
When you purchase an annual subscription, you can bring the cost of your continuing education to less than $4.00 an hour. To take advantage of this money-saving offer, visit our purchase page.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Holiday Discount for November and December
Enter the code “HolidaySpecial” on our purchase page in the text box at the top of the page next to "Enter offer code", click on the submit button immediately to the right of this text box, and receive 10% off all purchases for the months of November and December! (Submit the code prior to entering any other information on the rest of the purchase page. This code is valid for all purchases made during the two months of November and December of 2010. Offer expires on December 31, 2010).


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Private Practice Tools
The Counselor Connection is a comprehensive and simple service that connects clients with a therapist who can best meet their specific needs, circumstances and values.

Marijuana Treatment Project

The Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT), part of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, funded three clinical sites and a Coordinating Center (CC) to design and implement the Marijuana Treatment Project (MTP) in the late 1990s. A major focus of CSAT is rigorous testing of approaches to treat marijuana dependence in both adults and adolescents. MTP studied the efficacy of treatments for adults who are dependent on marijuana. At the time of funding, MTP was one of the largest Knowledge Development and Applications initiatives funded by CSAT. Another was the Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) Study, which resulted
in the CYT Series, a five-volume resource that provides unique perspectives on treating adolescents for marijuana use (Godley et al. 2001; Hamilton et al. 2001; Liddle 2002; Sampl and Kadden 2001; Webb et al. 2002). This manual for Brief Marijuana Dependence Counseling (BMDC) is based on the research
protocol used by counselors in MTP. The manual provides guidelines for counselors, social workers, and psychologists in both public and private settings who treat adults dependent on marijuana.

The 10 weekly one-on-one sessions in the BMDC manual offer examples of how a counselor can help a client understand certain topics, keep his or her determination to change, learn new skills, and access needed community supports (exhibit I-1). Stephens and colleagues (2002) describe the MTP rationale, design, and participant characteristics. Findings from MTP are presented in supplemental reading B of section VII.

Me? Hooked on Pot?
Many individuals for whom this intervention was designed often have difficulty accepting that they are dependent on marijuana. The topic is controversial, even for those who walk through a counselor’s door to talk about their marijuana use.
People who become clients in BMDC may have
• Put off actions and decisions to the point of being a burden on family and friends
• Given up personal aspirations
• Had nagging health concerns, such as worries about lung damage
• Made excuses for unfinished tasks or broken promises
• Experienced disapproval from family and friends
• Been involved in the criminal justice system.

Current Findings About Marijuana Use
Marijuana is the most commonly used illicit substance in the United States (Clark et al. 2002; Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration 2003). According to the 2003 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, 14.6 million people ages 12 and older had smoked marijuana in the preceding month (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration 2004). It is estimated that approximately 4.3 million people used marijuana at levels consistent with abuse or dependence in the past year. Given that it is an illicit substance, any use of marijuana carries with it some significant risks. However, this document focuses on people who use marijuana heavily or are dependent on it. This treatment manual is directed primarily at these
persons but may be useful for other persons with substance abuse or substance use disorders. Studies have demonstrated that tolerance and withdrawal develop with daily use of large doses of marijuana or THC (Haney et al. 1999a; Jones and Benowitz 1976; Kouri and Pope 2000). About 15 percent of people who acknowledge moderate-to-heavy use reported a withdrawal syndrome with symptoms of nervousness, sleep disturbance, and appetite change (Wiesbeck et al. 1996). Many adults who are marijuana dependent report affective (i.e., mood) symptoms and craving
during periods of abstinence when they present for treatment (Budney et al. 1999). The contribution of physical dependence to chronic marijuana use is not yet clear, but the existence of a dependence syndrome is fairly certain. An Epidemiological Catchment Area study conducted in Baltimore found that 6 percent of people who used marijuana met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) (American Psychiatric Association 1994), criteria for dependence and 7 percent met DSM-IV criteria for substance abuse (Rosenberg and Anthony 2001). Coffey and colleagues (2002) found that persons who use marijuana more than
once a week are at significant risk for dependence. In the 1990s, the number of people who sought treatment for marijuana dependence more than doubled (Budney et al. 2001). Therefore, a large group of adults who smoke marijuana is dependent and may need and benefit from treatment. Surveys of people using marijuana who are not in treatment consistently show that a majority report impairment of memory, concentration, motivation, self-esteem, interpersonal relationships,
health, employment, or finances related to their heavy marijuana use (Haas and Hendin 1987;

Section I. Introduction
Rainone et al. 1987; Roffman and Barnhart 1987; Solowij 1998). Similar marijuana-related consequences are seen among those seeking treatment for their marijuana use (Budney et al. 1998; Stephens et al. 1994b, 2000). People using marijuana who participated in previous treatment studies averaged more than 10 years of near-daily use and more than six serious attempts to quit (Stephens et al. 1994b, 2000). These individuals had persisted in their use despite multiple forms of impairment (i.e., social, psychological, physical), and most perceived themselves as unable to stop.
During the past decade evidence has emerged that a variety of problems are associated with chronic marijuana use. Although the severity of these problems appears to be less than that of problems caused by other drugs and alcohol, the large number of people using who may have these problems raises the possibility of a significant public health problem. Like those who use other mood-altering substances, many individuals who use marijuana chronically perceive the
problems to be severe enough to warrant treatment. The results of earlier studies on treatments for marijuana problems indicated that some adults
who used marijuana responded well to several types of interventions, such as cognitive behavioral, motivational enhancement, and voucher-based treatments (Budney et al. 2000; Stephens et al. 1994b, 2000). Relapse rates following treatment were similar to those for other drugs of abuse and, as found with other types of substance abuse treatment, improvements in drug use were accompanied by other positive gains, including improvements in dependence symptoms, problems
related to marijuana use, and anxiety symptoms. However, the generalizability of the treatment findings appeared to be limited by the predominantly white, male, and socioeconomically stable (i.e., educated and employed) characteristics of the samples. Therefore, the results of these studies may be limited to this fairly homogeneous group of people who are marijuana users.

Overview of the Marijuana Treatment Project1
CSAT funded MTP to design and conduct a study of the efficacy of treatments for marijuana
dependence, to extend this line of research, and to broaden the applicability of the approach to a
more diverse group than that used in earlier trials (Stephens et al. 1994b, 2000). The treatment
sites were the University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry,
Farmington, Connecticut; The Village South, Miami, Florida; and the University of Washington,
School of Social Work, Seattle, Washington. The CC was at the University of Connecticut,
Department of Psychiatry.
The study examined the efficacy of treatments of different durations for a diverse group of adults who
were marijuana dependent. Two treatments—one lasting two sessions, the other nine sessions—
were compared with a delayed treatment control (DTC) condition, in which subjects were offered
treatment 4 months after their baseline assessment. The same counselors delivered treatments of
both durations to avoid confounding the mode of treatment, length of treatment, and counselor
experience. A case management component was incorporated in the longer treatment to help clients
identify and overcome barriers to successful behavior change in their everyday environments. The
hypothesis was the nine-session and two-session interventions would produce outcomes superior to
the DTC in terms of higher abstinence rates and associated negative consequences.

National Strategy for Suicide Prevention

National Strategy for Suicide Prevention:
Goals and Objectives for Action

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preface from the Surgeon General:
Suicide exacts an enormous toll from the American people. Our Nation loses 30,000 lives to this tragedy each year, another 650,000 receive emergency care after attempting to take their own lives. The devastating trauma, loss, and suffering is multiplied in the lives of family members and friends. This document, National Strategy for Suicide Prevention – Goals and Objectives for Action, lays the foundation of our Nation's strategy to confront this serious public health problem.

At this document's source are countless dedicated individuals representing every facet of our Nation's communities. They include representatives to a 1993 United Nations/World Health Organization Conference who played key roles in establishing guidelines for national suicide prevention strategies. They include the passionate grassroots activists whose work stimulated Congressional Resolutions declaring suicide prevention a national priority and calling for our own national strategy. They include dedicated public servants and private individuals who jointly organized and participated in the first National Suicide Prevention Conference in 1998 to consolidate a scientific base for this critical endeavor. These people and their efforts led directly to publication of the Surgeon General's Call to Action to Prevent Suicide - 1999 with its most important recommendation, the completion of the National Strategy for Suicide Prevention.

After listening to the concerns of the American people, Government leaders helped bring stakeholders together in a shining example of public- private collaboration to achieve this major milestone in public health. Those who have invested their hearts and minds in this effort believe it effectively points the way for organizations and individuals to curtail the tragedy of suicide and suicidal behavior. Though it does not specify all the details, it provides essential guidance and suggests the fundamental activities that must follow–activities based on the best available science.

Nearly half of the States are engaged in suicide prevention and many have already committed significant resources to implement programs. Their leadership in evaluating the effectiveness of these programs will help guide the efforts of States that follow in their paths. Most of these plans recognize that much of the work of suicide prevention must occur at the community level, where human relationships breathe life into public policy. American communities are also home to scores of faith-based and secular initiatives that help reduce risk factors and promote protective factors associated with many of our most pressing social problems, including suicide.

As you read further, keep in mind that the National Strategy for Suicide Prevention is not the Surgeon General's strategy or the Federal government's strategy; rather, it is the strategy of the American people for improving their health and well-being through the prevention of suicide. I congratulate each person who played a role in bringing it to completion. You have served your fellow Americans well.

Sincerely yours,
David Satcher, M.D., Ph.D.
Surgeon General