Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

November 18, 2010

Faith, Spirituality & Mental Illness CEUs


Evidence is growing of the value that faith-based organizations offer to people with mental illnesses.

Faith-based communities often contribute to recovery by promoting hope and by offering solace and comfort in troubled times; and many consumers acknowledge the positive impact of spirituality and faith on their recovery and ability to cope with life's stresses.

However, not all faith-based organizations are equally knowledgeable about how best to serve people with mental health disorders.

The information available on this Web page can help faith-based communities - both clergy and congregants - increase their awareness of mental health issues and find ways to welcome and support people with mental illnesses, thus reducing discrimination and increasing social inclusion.

1 in 4 households in your church is afraid to tell you this secret
By Carlene Hill Byron

How many families in your church have a loved one who struggles with mental health problems? That’s kind of a trick question. People don’t talk about mental health problems. You’re more likely to hear
them describe their child’s condition as “something like autism,” as the elder of one church we know says. Or they might cover up entirely, as does an elder’s wife in another congregation. When her bipolar disorder swung into mania after childbirth, her family, already managing the added responsibilities of a newborn, had
to manage her condition as well. But because her condition is a secret, they did so without any support beyond the usual “new baby” dinners. The answer to the question is, if your congregation is representative of the U.S. population, one in four
households will struggle with someone’s mental health problems over their lifetime. That’s schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, disabling chronic depression,and various anxiety disorders. Look at the faces seated around you this Sunday. Someone is probably hurting. And they’re probably afraid to tell you.

The least acceptable disability
A study where people ranked disabilities by their “acceptability” returned these results, in order--most acceptable: obvious physical disabilities, blindness, deafness, a jail record, learning disabilities, and alcoholism. Least acceptable: mental health problems. People with mental health problems frighten us because when people become mentally ill, they become someone we don’t know. A bright boy who was his family’s bright hope may find he just can’t cut it anymore as schizophrenia turns him paranoid, disoriented, unmotivated in the extreme, and overwhelmed by
delusional voices that tell him, over and over, how worthless he is. Or, in the case of bipolar disorder, a girl who was a well-liked and active member of her Teen Challenge group may suddenly turn promiscuous, run away from home, and make a new home in the streets of a strange city. Laziness. Promiscuity. Violence. Sin.
That’s what many people see when they look at those with mental health problems. It’s hard to believe that people may behave in such unacceptable ways and not be in control of their behavior. Having a mental health problem is a lot like being on alcohol or drugs, without being able to stop. Medications “work” for
about two-thirds of us. That means that a third of us can’t ever get off the chemical ride that our brains produce. For those of us who can use medications, the side effects can be daunting. Many people become so frustrated with side effects that they stop taking medications. Only about half of us
accept treatment. Even when we are treated, not everyone regains their status as a fully functioning adult.

The challenging good news is that when people with mental illness turn to someone outside “the system” for help, the church is first to get the call 40 percent of the time. Is your church ready?
MFT CEUs, LCSW CEUs
Carlene Hill Byron is the former Director of Communications for Vision New England. Through NAMI—the Nation’s Voice on Mental Illness, she and her husband, James, train churches to effectively serve people within the congregation with mental health problems and also teach NAMI’s class for families of people
with mental health problems. They are members of Asbury United Methodist Church in Raleigh, North Carolina, where James serves on staff.
First published by Vision New England’s Ministries with the Disabled, Acton, Massachusetts.

November 17, 2010

Are There Different Types of Stress?


Stress management can be complicated and confusing because there are different types of stress: acute stress, episodic acute stress, chronic stress, and posttraumatic stress, each with its own characteristics, symptoms, duration, and treatment approaches.

Acute stress is the most common form of stress. It comes from demands and pressures of the recent past and anticipated demands and pressures of the near future. Because it is short-term, acute stress does not have enough time to do the extensive damage associated with long-term stress. Acute stress can crop up in anyone's life, and it is highly treatable and manageable.

Those who suffer acute stress frequently are dealing with episodic acute stress. It is common for people with episodic acute stress to be over-aroused, short-tempered, irritable, anxious, and tense. Interpersonal relationships deteriorate rapidly when others respond with real hostility. Work becomes a very stressful place for them. Often, lifestyle and personality issues are so ingrained and habitual with these individuals that they see nothing wrong with the way they conduct their lives. They blame their woes on other people and external events. Frequently, they see their lifestyles, patterns of interacting with others, and ways of perceiving the world as part and parcel of who and what they are. Without proper coping strategies, episodic acute stress develops into chronic stress.

Chronic stress is the grinding stress that wears people away day after day, year after year. It destroys bodies, minds, and lives. It is the stress of unrelenting demands and pressures for seemingly interminable periods of time. The worst aspect of chronic stress is that people get used to it. They forget it is there. People are immediately aware of acute stress because it is new. Chronic stress is ignored because it is familiar and almost comfortable.

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) stems from traumatic experiences that become internalized and remain forever painful and present. Individuals experiencing PTSD could exhibit signs of hypervigilance (an easily triggered startle response). People with an exaggerated startle response are easily startled by any number of things (e.g., loud noises, doors slamming, shouting). They usually feel tense or on edge. Along with hypervigilance, people experiencing PTSD symptoms also could be dealing with avoidance issues including staying away from places, events, or objects that are reminders of the experience; feeling emotionally numb; feeling strong guilt, depression, or worry; losing interest in activities that were enjoyable in the past; and having trouble remembering the dangerous event. People experiencing PTSD symptoms wear down to breaking points because physical and mental resources are depleted through long-term attrition. The symptoms of posttraumatic stress are difficult to treat and may require the help of a doctor or mental health professional. mft continuing education, social worker continuing education

November 16, 2010

PBS’s This Emotional Life: Documentary Launches a Campaign of Hope


PBS’s This Emotional Life: Documentary Launches a Campaign of Hope

Millions of Americans struggle to find more meaning in their lives every day.

To help, Vulcan Productions and NOVA/WGBH brought together a number of public and private organizations around a nationwide, multi-faceted project launched in conjunction with the recent PBS series, This Emotional Life.

The 2-year campaign aims to bring help and hope to those trying to improve their lives. The campaign includes SAMHSA, the National Alliance on Mental Illness, the Mayo Clinic, Blue Star Families, and other organizations.

"This is a unique opportunity to leverage the power of media to effect societal change — in this case, in the area of mental health and emotional well-being,&rquot; said A. Kathryn Power, M.Ed., Director of SAMHSA’s Center for Mental Health Services. "SAMHSA is working closely with the This Emotional Life team to make sure that the information, stories, and resources that make up this unprecedented project get to the people who need them most."

Documentary & Web Site
What do an uncontrollably angry teen and a misunderstood lottery winner have in common? Or how about a young husband misunderstood by his wife and an elderly woman on her way to a senior center? They were all interviewed for the PBS series This Emotional Life, which premiered in early January 2010.

This Emotional Life is a multi-platform endeavor that explores the science behind the human quest for emotional well-being, the barriers that stand in the way of this pursuit, and the importance of social relationships in surmounting life’s challenges and finding happiness.

"The TV series is the cornerstone of a broader project to help people form better, deeper, and more profound human connections," said Richard Hutton, Senior Executive Producer of Vulcan Productions.

This Emotional Life is complemented by a Web site, which provides vetted resources to build social support networks around topics highlighted in the series, such as the importance of early attachment, how to heal strained or damaged relationships, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), stress, depression, grief, resilience and our pursuit of happiness.

Toolkits
Vulcan Productions is developing two toolkits, one that addresses early attachment for parents of infants and a second that addresses the emotional challenges faced by military service members and their families during the deployment cycle.

SAMHSA is distributing and assembling the "Early Moments Matter" toolkit designed to educate parents and caregivers of infants about what attachment is and why it's important.

The toolkit also provides parents concrete advice on ways to build attachment, a key to healthy social and emotional development. It will be distributed in high-birthrate hospitals, pediatric doctors' offices, and community-based clinics, as well as through partners who serve expecting and new parents.
mental health and social work continuing education ceu
"The Family Guide to Military Deployment," will provide tangible resources and tools to the families and friends of some of the 1.8 million servicemen and women who have been deployed, helping them face the emotional challenges typical of pre-deployment, deployment, and post-deployment.

For details about the documentary and campaign, visit the PBS Web site.

November 15, 2010

Resilience


What Is Resilience?

Resilience is the ability to:
Bounce back
Take on difficult challenges and still find meaning in life
Respond positively to difficult situations
Rise above adversity
Cope when things look bleak
Tap into hope
Transform unfavorable situations into wisdom, insight, and compassion
Endure

Resilience refers to the ability of an individual, family, organization, or community to cope with adversity and adapt to challenges or change. It is an ongoing process that requires time and effort and engages people in taking a number of steps to enhance their response to adverse circumstances. Resilience implies that after an event, a person or community may not only be able to cope and recover, but also change to reflect different priorities arising from the experience and prepare for the next stressful situation.

Resilience is the most important defense people have against stress.
It is important to build and foster resilience to be ready for future challenges.
Resilience will enable the development of a reservoir of internal resources to draw upon during stressful situations.
Research (Aguirre, 2007; American Psychological Association, 2006; Bonanno, 2004) has shown that resilience is ordinary, not extraordinary, and that people regularly demonstrate being resilient.

Resilience is not a trait that people either have or do not have.
Resilience involves behaviors, thoughts, and actions that can be learned and developed in anyone.
Resilience is tremendously influenced by a person's environment.
Resilience changes over time. It fluctuates depending on how much a person nurtures internal resources or coping strategies. Some people are more resilient in work life, while others exhibit more resilience in their personal relationships. People can build resilience and promote the foundations of resilience in any aspect of life they choose.

What Is Individual or Personal Resilience?
Individual resilience is a person's ability to positively cope after failures, setbacks, and losses. Developing resilience is a personal journey. Individuals do not react the same way to traumatic or stressful life events. An approach to building resilience that works for one person might not work for another. People use varying strategies to build their resilience. Because resilience can be learned, it can be strengthened. Personal resilience is related to many factors including individual health and well-being, individual aspects, life history and experience, and social support.

Individual Health and Well-Being Individual Aspects Life History and Experience Social Support These are factors with which a person is born.

Personality
Ethnicity
Cultural background
Economic background

These are past events and relationships that influence how people approach current stressors:
Family history
Previous physical health
Previous mental health
Trauma history
Past social experiences
Past cultural experiences

These are support systems provided by family, friends, and members of the community, work, or school environments:
Feeling connected to others
A sense of security
Feeling connected to resources
(Adapted from Simon, Murphy, & Smith, 2008)


Along with the factors listed above, there are several attributes that have been correlated with building and promoting resilience.

The American Psychological Association reports the following attributes regarding resilience:
The capacity to make and carry out realistic plans
Communication and problem-solving skills
A positive or optimistic view of life
Confidence in personal strengths and abilities
The capacity to manage strong feelings, emotions, and impulses

What Is Family Resilience?
Family resilience is the coping process in the family as a functional unit. Crisis events and persistent stressors affect the whole family, posing risks not only for individual dysfunction, but also for relational conflict and family breakdown. Family processes mediate the impact of stress for all of its members and relationships, and the protective processes in place foster resilience by buffering stress and facilitating adaptation to current and future events. Following are the three key factors in family resilience (Wilson & Ferch, 2005):

Family belief systems foster resilience by making meaning in adversity, creating a sense of coherence, and providing a positive outlook.
Family organization promotes resilience by facilitating flexibility, capacity to adapt, connectedness and cohesion, emotional and structural bonding, and accessibility to resources.
Family communication enhances resilience by engaging clear communication, open and emotional expressions, trust and collaborative problem solving, and conflict management.

What Is Organizational Resilience?
Organizational resilience is the ability and capacity of a workplace to withstand potential significant economic times, systemic risk, or systemic disruptions by adapting, recovering, or resisting being affected and resuming core operations or continuing to provide an acceptable level of functioning and structure.

A resilient workforce and organization is important during major decisions or business changes.
Companies and organizations, like individuals, need to be able to rebound from potentially disastrous changes.
The challenge for the incorporation of resilience into a workplace is to identify what enhances the ability of an organization to rebound effectively.
Measuring workplace resilience involves identifying and evaluating the following:
Past and present mitigative mechanisms and practices that increase safety
Past and present mitigative mechanisms and practices that decrease error
Necessary redundancy in systems
Planning and programming that demonstrate collective mindfulness
Anticipation of potential trouble and solutions to potential problems

What Is Community Resilience?
Community resilience is the individual and collective capacity to respond to adversity and change. It is a community that takes intentional action to enhance the personal and collective capacity of its citizens and institutions to respond to and influence the course of social and economic change. For a community to be resilient, its members must put into practice early and effective actions so that they can respond to change. When responding to stressful events, a resilient community will be able to strengthen community bonds, resources, and the capacity to cope. Systems involved with building and maintaining community resilience must work together.
mental health and social work ceus

How Does Culture Influence Resilience?
Cultural resilience refers to a culture’s capacity to maintain and develop cultural identity and critical cultural knowledge and practices. Along with an entire culture fostering resilience, the interaction of culture and resilience for an individual also is important. An individual’s culture will have an impact on how the person communicates feelings and copes with adversity. Cultural parameters are often embedded deep in an individual. A person’s cultural background may influence one deeply in how one responds to different stressors. Assimilation could be a factor in cultural resilience, as it could be a positive way for a person to manage his/her environment. However, assimilation could create conflict between generations, so it could be seen as positive or negative depending on the individual and culture. Because of this, coping strategies are going to be different. With growing cultural diversity, the public has greater access to a number of different approaches to building resilience. It is something that can be built using approaches that make sense within each culture and tailored to each individual.

Back to Top

What Factors Promote Resilience?
Resilience involves the modification of a person's response to a potentially risky situation. People who are resilient are able to maintain high self-esteem and self-efficacy in spite of the challenges they face. By fostering resilience, people are building psychological defenses against stress. The more resources and defenses available during a time of struggle, the better able to cope and bounce back from adverse circumstances people will be. A person’s ability to regain a sense of normalcy or define a new normalcy after adverse circumstances will be partially based on the resources available to him/her. Resilience building can begin at any time. Following is information regarding applicable ways to implement resilience practices, as well as situations that could inhibit resilience, situations that enhance resilience, and people who help facilitate the growth of resilience.

Resilience


Demonstrating Resilience Vulnerability Factors Inhibiting Resilience Protective Factors Enhancing Resilience Facilitators of Resilience
Individual Resilience
The ability for an individual to cope with adversity and change
Optimism
Flexibility
Self-confidence
Competence
Insightfulness
Perseverance
Perspective
Self-control
Sociability
Poor social skills
Poor problem solving
Lack of empathy
Family violence
Abuse or neglect
Divorce or partner breakup
Death or loss
Lack of social support
Social competence
Problem-solving skills
Good coping skills
Empathy
Secure or stable family
Supportive relationships
Intellectual abilities
Self-efficacy
Communication skills

Individuals
Parents
Grandparents
Caregivers
Children
Adolescents
Friends
Partners
Spouses
Teachers
Faith Community

Organizational Resilience
The ability for a business or industry, including its employees, to cope with adversity and change
Proactive employees
Clear mission, goals, and values
Encourages opportunities to influence change
Clear communication
Nonjudgmental
Emphasizes learning
Rewards high performance
Unclear Expectations
Conflicted expectations
Threat to job security
Lack of personal control
Hostile atmosphere
Defensive atmosphere
Unethical environment
Lack of communication

Open communication
Supportive colleagues
Clear responsibilities
Ethical environment
Sense of control
Job security
Supportive management
Connectedness among departments
Recognition

Employers
Managers
Directors
Employees
Employee assistance programs
Other businesses

Community Resilience
The ability for an individual and the collective community to respond to adversity and change.
Connectedness
Commitment to community
Shared values
Structure, roles, and responsibilities exist throughout community
Supportive
Good communication
Resource sharing
Volunteerism
Responsive organizations
Strong schools

Lack of support services
Social discrimination
Cultural discrimination
Norms tolerating violence
Deviant peer group
Low socioeconomic status
Crime rate
Community disorganization
Civil rivalry
Access to Support services
Community networking
Strong cultural identity
Strong social support systems
Norms against violence
Identification as a community
Cohesive community leadership
Community leaders
Faith-based organizations
Volunteers
Nonprofit organizations
Churches/houses of worship
Support services staff
Teachers
Youth groups
Boy/Girl Scouts
Planned social networking events

(Adapted from Kelly, 2007)
Back to Top

How Is Personal Resilience Built?
Developing resilience is a personal journey. People do not react the same way to traumatic events. Some ways to build resilience include the following actions:

Making connections with others
Looking for opportunities for self-discovery
Nurturing a positive view of self
Accepting that change is a part of living
Taking decisive actions
Learning from the past
The ability to be flexible is a great skill to obtain and facilitates resilience growth. Getting help when it is needed is crucial to building resilience. It is important to try to obtain information on resilience from books or other publications, self-help or support groups, and online resources like the ones found in this resource collection.

Back to Top

What Can Be Done to Promote Family Resilience?
Developing family resilience, like individual resilience, is different for every family. The important idea to keep in mind is that an underlying stronghold of family resilience is cohesion, a sense of belonging, and communication. It is important for a family to feel that when their world is unstable they have each other. This sense of bonding and trust is what fuels a family's ability to be resilient. Families that learn how to cope with challenges and meet individual needs are more resilient to stress and crisis. Healthy families solve problems with cooperation, creative brainstorming, openness to others, and emphasis on the role of social support and connectedness (versus isolation) in family resiliency. Resilience is exercised when family members demonstrate behaviors such as confidence, hard work, cooperation, and forgiveness. These are factors that help families withstand stressors throughout the family life cycle.

Back to Top

How Is Community Resilience Fostered?
Fostering community resilience will greatly depend on the community itself and involves the community working as a whole toward preparedness. It is the capacity for the collective to take preemptive action toward preparedness. Community resilience involves the following factors:

Connection and caring
Collective resources
Critical analysis of the community
Skill building for community members
Prevention, preparedness, and response to stressful events
Resilience is exercised when community members demonstrate behaviors such as confidence, hard work, cooperation, and resourcefulness, and support of those who have needs during particular events. These are factors that help communities withstand challenging circumstances. There are other tips about how to foster community resilience in this resource collection.

Developing resilience is a personal journey. All people do not react the same to traumatic and stressful life events. An approach to building resilience that works for one person might not work for another. People use varying strategies. Resilience involves maintaining flexibility and balance in life during stressful circumstances and traumatic events. Being resilient does not mean that a person does not experience difficulty or distress. Emotional pain and sadness are common in people who have suffered major adversity or trauma in their lives. Stress can be dealt with proactively by building resilience to prepare for stressful circumstances, while learning how to recognize symptoms of stress. Fostering resilience or the ability to bounce back from a stressful situation is a proactive mechanism to managing stress.

Back to Top

References
Aguirre, B. (2007). Dialectics of vulnerability and resilience. Georgetown Journal of Poverty Law and Policy, 14(39), 1–18.

American Psychological Association. (2006). The road to resilience. Retrieved March 20, 2009, from " target="_blank">http://www.apahelpcenter.org/featuredtopics/feature.php?id=6.

Bonanno, G. (2004). Loss, trauma, and human resilience: Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? American Psychologist, 59, 20–28.

Kelly, S. (2007). Personal and community resilience: Building it and sustaining it. Retrieved March 23, 2009, from the University of California Los Angeles Bureau for Behavioral Health and Health Facilities at " target="_blank">http://www.wvdhhr.org/healthprep/common/resiliency.ppt#256.

Simon, J., Murphy, J., & Smith, S. (2008). Building resilience: Appreciate the little things in life. British Journal of Social Work, 38, 218–235.

Wilson, S., & Ferch, S. (2005). Enhancing resilience in the workplace through the practice of caring relationships. Organization Development Journal, 23(4), 45–60.

OxyContin® Abuse and Addiction Continuing Education CEUs


The media have issued numerous reports about the apparent increase in OxyContin® abuse and addiction. Some of these reports include the following:

• In Madison, Wisconsin, a task force reported a dramatic increase in OxyContin cases since 2003. Most OxyContin making its way onto the streets of Madison and nearby communities was believed to have been stolen from local pharmacies.1
• The police chief in Billerica, Massachusetts, reported a “dramatic increase in OxyContin abuse.”2
• The distribution of OxyContin in Virginia was reported to be well above the national average. In the counties of far southwest Virginia, where the hard physical labor of coal mining and farming leads to a higher incidence of injuries, OxyContin prescriptions were generally 500 percent above the national average.3
• Sixty-nine percent of police chiefs and sheriffs said they have witnessed an increase in the abuse of painkillers such as OxyContin. The areas most affected are eastern Kentucky, New Orleans, southern Maine, Philadelphia, southwestern Pennsylvania, southwestern Virginia, Cincinnati, and Phoenix.4

These reports may reflect some of your experiences: We know many of you are treating clients addicted to OxyContin.

OxyContin has been heralded as a miracle drug that allows patients with chronic pain to resume a normal life. It has also been called pharmaceutical heroin and is thought to have been responsible for a number of deaths and robberies in areas where its abuse has been reported. Patients who legitimately use OxyContin fear that the continuing controversy will mean tighter restrictions on the medication. Those who abuse OxyContin reportedly go to great lengths—legal or illegal—to obtain the powerful drug.

At the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT), we are not interested in fueling the controversy about the use or abuse of OxyContin. As the Federal Government’s focal point for addiction treatment information, CSAT is instead interested in helping professionals on the front line of substance abuse treatment by providing you with the facts about OxyContin, its use and abuse, and how to treat individuals who present at your treatment facility with OxyContin concerns. Perhaps these individuals are taking medically prescribed OxyContin to manage pain and are concerned about their physical dependence on the medication. Perhaps you are faced with a young adult who thought that OxyContin was a “safe” recreational drug because, after all, doctors prescribe it. Possibly changes in the availability or quality of illicit opioid drugs in your community have led to abuse of and addiction to OxyContin.

Whatever the reason, OxyContin is being abused, and people are becoming addicted. And in many instances, these people are young adults unaware of the dangers of OxyContin. Many of these individuals mix OxyContin with alcohol and drugs, and the result is all too often tragic.

Abuse of prescription drugs is not a new phenomenon. You have undoubtedly heard about abuse of Percocet®, hydrocodone, and a host of other medications. What sets OxyContin abuse apart is the potency of the drug. Treatment providers in affected areas say that they were unprepared for the speed with which an OxyContin “epidemic” developed in their communities.

We at CSAT want to make sure that you are prepared if OxyContin abuse becomes a problem in your community. This revised issue of the original Substance Abuse Treatment Advisory on OxyContin will help prepare you by

• Answering frequently asked questions about OxyContin
• Providing you with general information about semisynthetic opioids and their addiction potential
• Summarizing evidence-based protocols for treatment
• Providing you with resources for further information

For more information about OxyContin abuse and treatment, see our resource boxes and end of this document. Feel free to copy the information in the Substance Abuse Treatment Advisory and share it with colleagues so that they, too, can have the most current information about this critically important topic.

OxyContin® Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is OxyContin?

A: OxyContin is a semisynthetic opioid analgesic prescribed for chronic or long-lasting pain. The medication’s active ingredient is oxycodone, which is also found in drugs like Percodan® and Tylox®. However, OxyContin contains between 10 and 80 milligrams (mg) of oxycodone in a timed-release tablet. Painkillers such as Tylox contain 5 mg of oxycodone and often require repeated doses to bring about pain relief because they lack the timed-release formulation.

Q: How is OxyContin used?

A: OxyContin, also referred to as “Oxy,” “O.C.,” and “Oxycotton” on the street, is legitimately prescribed as a timed-release tablet, providing as many as 12 hours of relief from chronic pain. It is often prescribed for cancer patients or those with chronic, long-lasting back pain. The benefit of the medication to people who suffer from chronic pain is that they generally need to take the pill only twice a day, whereas a dosage of another medication would require more frequent use to control the pain. The goal of chronic pain treatment is to decrease pain and improve function.

Q: How is OxyContin abused?

A: People who abuse OxyContin either crush the tablet and ingest or snort it or dilute it in water and inject it. Crushing or diluting the tablet disarms the timed-release action of the medication and causes a quick, powerful high. Those who abuse OxyContin have compared this feeling to the euphoria they experience when taking heroin. In fact, in some areas, the use of heroin is overshadowed by the abuse of OxyContin.

Purdue Pharma, OxyContin’s manufacturer, has taken steps to reduce the potential for abuse of OxyContin and other pain medications. Its Web site lists the following initiatives: funding educational programs to teach healthcare professionals how to assess and treat patients suffering from pain, providing prescribers with tamper-proof prescription pads, developing and distributing more than 1 million brochures to pharmacists and healthcare professionals to help educate them about medication diversion, working with healthcare and law enforcement officials to address prescription drug abuse, and endorsing the development of State and national prescription drug monitoring programs to detect diversion. In addition, the company is attempting to research and develop other pain management products that will be more resistant to abuse and diversion. The company estimates that it will take significant time for such products to be brought to market. For more information, visit Purdue Pharma’s Web site at www.purduepharma.com or call the company at 203–588–8069.

Q: How does OxyContin abuse differ from abuse of other pain prescriptions?

A: Abuse of prescription pain medications is not new. Two primary factors, however, set OxyContin abuse apart from other prescription drug abuse. First, OxyContin is a powerful drug that contains a much larger amount of the active ingredient, oxycodone, than other prescription pain relievers. By crushing the tablet and either ingesting or snorting it, or by injecting diluted OxyContin, people who abuse the opioid feel its powerful effects in a short time, rather than over a 12-hour span. Second, great profits can be made in the illegal sale of OxyContin. A 40-mg pill costs approximately $4 by prescription, yet it may sell for $20 to $40 on the street, depending on the area of the country in which the drug is sold.5

OxyContin can be comparatively inexpensive if it is legitimately prescribed and if its cost is covered by insurance. However, the National Drug Intelligence Center reports that people who abuse OxyContin may use heroin if their insurance will no longer pay for their OxyContin prescription because heroin is less expensive than OxyContin that is purchased illegally.6

Q: Why are so many crimes reportedly associated with OxyContin abuse?

A: Many reports of OxyContin abuse have occurred in rural areas that have housed labor-intensive industries, such as logging or coal mining. These industries are often located in economically depressed areas, as well. Therefore, people for whom the drug may have been legitimately prescribed may be tempted to sell their prescriptions for profit. Substance abuse treatment providers say that the addiction is so strong that people will go to great lengths to get the drug, including robbing pharmacies and writing false prescriptions.

Q: What is the likelihood that a person for whom OxyContin is prescribed will become addicted?

A: Most people who take OxyContin as prescribed do not become addicted. The National Institute on Drug Abuse reports: “Long-term use [of opioids] can lead to physical dependence—the body adapts to the presence of the substance and withdrawal symptoms occur if use is reduced abruptly. This can also include tolerance, which means that higher doses of a medication must be taken to obtain the same initial effects. . . . Studies have shown that properly managed medical use of opioid analgesic compounds is safe and rarely causes addiction. Taken exactly as prescribed, opioids can be used to manage pain effectively.”7

One review found, “A multitude of studies indicate that the rate of opioid addiction in populations of chronic pain sufferers is similar to the rate of opioid addiction within the general population, falling in the range of 1 to 2 percent or less.”8

In short, most individuals who are prescribed OxyContin, or any other opioid, will not become addicted, although they may become dependent on the drug and will need to be withdrawn by a qualified physician. Individuals who are taking the drug as prescribed should continue to do so, as long as they and their physician agree that taking the drug is a medically appropriate way for them to manage pain.

Q: How can I determine whether a person who uses OxyContin is dependent on rather than addicted to OxyContin?

A: When pain patients take an opioid analgesic as directed, or to the point where their pain is adequately controlled, it is not abuse or addiction. Abuse occurs when patients take more than is needed for pain control, especially if they take it to get high. Patients who take their medication in a manner that grossly differs from a physician’s directions are probably abusing that drug.

If a patient continues to seek excessive pain medication after pain management is achieved, the patient may be addicted. Addiction is characterized by the repeated, compulsive use of a substance despite adverse social, psychological, and/or physical consequences. Addiction is often (but not always) accompanied by physical dependence, withdrawal syndrome, and tolerance. Physical dependence is defined as a physiologic state of adaptation to a substance. The absence of this substance produces symptoms and signs of withdrawal. Withdrawal syndrome is often characterized by overactivity of the physiological functions that were suppressed by the drug and/or depression of the functions that were stimulated by the drug. Opioids often cause sleepiness, calmness, and constipation, so opioid withdrawal often includes insomnia, anxiety, and diarrhea.

Pain patients, however, may sometimes develop a physical dependence during treatment with opioids. This is not an addiction. A gradual decrease of the medication dose over time, as the pain is resolving, brings the former pain patient to a drug-free state without any craving for repeated doses of the drug. This is the difference between the patient treated for pain who was formerly dependent and has now been withdrawn from medication and the patient who is opioid addicted: The patient addicted to diverted pharmaceutical opioids continues to have a severe and uncontrollable craving that almost always leads to eventual relapse in the absence of adequate treatment. This uncontrollable craving for another “rush” of the drug differentiates the patient who is “detoxified” but opioid addicted from the former pain patient. Theoretically, a person who abuses opioids might develop a physical dependence but obtain treatment in the first few months of abuse, before becoming addicted. In this case, supervised withdrawal (detoxification) followed by a few months of abstinence-oriented treatment might be sufficient for the patient who is not addicted who abuses opioids. If, however, this patient subsequently relapses to opioid abuse, then that behavior would support a diagnosis of opioid addiction. If the patient has several relapses to opioid abuse, he or she will require long-term treatment for the opioid addiction. (See the section titled Treatment and Detoxification Protocols to learn more about treatment options.)

Q: I work at a facility that does not use medication-assisted treatment. What treatment should I provide to individuals addicted to or dependent on OxyContin?

A: The majority of U.S. treatment facilities do not offer medication-assisted treatment. However, because of the strength of OxyContin and its powerful addiction potential, medical complications may be increased by quickly withdrawing individuals from the drug. Premature withdrawal may cause individuals to seek heroin, and the quality of that heroin will not be known. In addition, these individuals, if injecting heroin, may also expose themselves to HIV and hepatitis. Most people addicted to OxyContin need medication-assisted treatment. Even if individuals have been taking OxyContin legitimately to manage pain, they should not stop taking the drug all at once. Instead, their dosages should be tapered down until medication is no longer needed. If you work in a drug-free or abstinence-based treatment facility, it is important to refer patients to facilities where they can receive appropriate treatment. (See SAMHSA Resources.)

Treatment and Detoxification Protocols

OxyContin® is a powerful drug that contains a much larger amount of the active ingredient, oxycodone, than other prescription opioid pain relievers. Whereas most people who take OxyContin as prescribed do not become addicted, those who abuse their pain medication or obtain it illegally may find themselves becoming rapidly dependent on, if not addicted to, the drug.

Two types of treatment have been documented as most effective for opioid addiction. One is a long-term, residential, therapeutic community type of treatment, and the other is long-term, medication-assisted outpatient treatment. Clinical trials using medications to treat opioid addiction have generally included subjects addicted to diverted pharmaceutical opioids as well as to illicit heroin. Therefore, there is no medical reason to suppose that the patient addicted to diverted pharmaceutical opioids is any less likely to benefit from medication-assisted treatment than the patient addicted to heroin.

Some patients who are opioid addicted who have very good social supports may occasionally be able to benefit from antagonist treatment with naltrexone. This treatment works best if the patient is highly motivated to participate in treatment and has undergone adequate detoxification from the opioid of abuse. Most patients who are opioid addicted in outpatient therapy, however, do best with medication that is either an agonist or a partial agonist. Methadone is the agonist medication most commonly prescribed for opioid addiction treatment in this country. Buprenorphine is the only partial agonist approved by the Food and Drug Administration for opioid addiction treatment.

The guidelines for treating OxyContin addiction or dependence are basically no different than the guidelines the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT) uses for treating addiction to or dependence on any opioid. However, because OxyContin contains higher dose levels of opioid than are typically found in other oxycodone-containing pain medications, higher dosages of methadone or buprenorphine may be needed to appropriately treat patients who abuse OxyContin.

Methadone or buprenorphine may be used for OxyContin addiction treatment or, for that matter, treatment for addiction to any other opioid, including the semisynthetic opioids. Medication-assisted treatment for prescription opioid abuse is not a new treatment approach. For instance, in 2002, Alaska estimated that 15,000 people abused prescription opioids in the State and that most patients receiving methadone were not addicted to heroin. In addition, a significant percentage of patients in publicly supported methadone programs were not being treated for heroin addiction but for abuse of semisynthetic opioids (e.g., hydrocodone). The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Drug Abuse Warning Network emergency room data show that both oxycodone and hydrocodone mentions increased dramatically in the United States between 1995 and 2002.9 And when Arkansas opened its first methadone maintenance clinic in December 1993, the vast majority of its clients were not admitted for heroin addiction but for semisynthetic opioid abuse. These individuals had been traveling to other States for treatment because methadone treatment was not available near their homes.

Using the criteria above describing the difference between addiction to and dependence on OxyContin, you may be able to determine whether a patient requires treatment for opioid addiction. If this is the case, methadone or buprenorphine may be used for withdrawal. For certain patient populations, including those with many treatment failures, methadone or buprenorphine is the treatment of choice.10

“As substance abuse treatment professionals, we have the responsibility for learning as much as we can about OxyContin and then providing appropriate treatment for people addicted to it. Appropriate treatment will nearly always involve prescribing methadone, buprenorphine, or, in some cases, naltrexone,” says H. Westley Clark, M.D., J.D., Director of CSAT. “Programs that do not offer medication-assisted treatment will need to refer patients who are addicted to OxyContin to programs that do,” he adds.

It is important to assess an individual’s eligibility for medication-assisted treatment with methadone or buprenorphine to determine whether he or she is eligible for this type of treatment and whether it would be appropriate. The assessment may take place in a hospital emergency department, central intake unit, or similar place. Final assessment of an individual’s eligibility for medication-assisted treatment must be completed by treatment program staff. The preliminary assessment should include the following areas:11

• Determining the need for emergency care
• Diagnosing the presence and severity of opioid dependence
• Determining the extent of alcohol and drug abuse
• Screening for co-occurring medical and psychiatric conditions
• Evaluating an individual’s living situation, family and social problems, and legal problems

“. . . we have the responsibility for learning as much as we can about OxyContin, and then providing appropriate treatment for people who are addicted to it.”

H. Westley Clark, M.D., J.D., M.P.H., CAS, FASAM
Director, CSAT

Treatment Improvement Protocols (TIPs) and Collateral Products Addressing Opioid Addiction Treatment

TIP 40 Clinical Guidelines for the Use of Buprenorphine in the Treatment of Opioid Addiction BKD500

Quick Guide for Physicians Based on TIP 40: Clinical Guidelines for the Use of Buprenorphine in the Treatment of Opioid Addiction QGPT40

KAP Keys for Physicians Based on TIP 40: Clinical Guidelines for the Use of Buprenorphine in the Treatment of Opioid Addiction KAPT40

TIP 43 Medication-Assisted Treatment for Opioid Addiction in Opioid Treatment Programs BKD524

Quick Guide for Clinicians Based on TIP 43: Medication-Assisted Treatment for Opioid Addiction in Opioid Treatment Programs QGCT43

KAP Keys for Clinicians Based on TIP 43: Medication-Assisted Treatment for Opioid Addiction in Opioid Treatment Programs KAPT43

SAMHSA Resources

To find a substance abuse treatment facility near you, visit the Substance Abuse Treatment Facility Locator at www.findtreatment.samhsa.gov. Call the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Substance Abuse Treatment Hotline at 800–662–HELP for substance abuse treatment referral information.

For More Information About Treatment for Opioid Addiction

Sign up for SAMHSA’s Information Mailing System (SIMS) to receive information about the following topics:

• Grant announcements
• Funding opportunities such as competitive contract announcements
• Prevention materials and publications
• Treatment- and provider-oriented materials and publications
• Research findings and reports
• Announcements of available research data sets
• Policy announcements and materials

To sign up for this free service, use one of the following methods to contact SIMS:

Web: http://sims.health.org
Mail: SAMHSA’s National Clearinghouse for Alcohol and Drug Information (NCADI)
Attn: Mailing List Manager
P.O. Box 2345
Rockville, MD 20847–2345
Phone: 800–729–6686
Fax: 301–468–6433
Attn: Mailing List Manager

Three Ways To Obtain Free Copies of All CSAT Products:

1. Call SAMHSA’s NCADI at 800–729–6686; TDD (hearing impaired) 800–487–4889
2. Visit NCADI’s Web site, www.ncadi.samhsa.gov
3. Access TIPs on line at www.kap.samhsa.gov


Substance Abuse Treatment Advisory

Substance Abuse Treatment Advisory—published on an as-needed basis for treatment providers—was written and produced under contract number 270-04-7049 by the Knowledge Application Program (KAP), a Joint Venture of JBS International, Inc., and The CDM Group, Inc., for the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of SAMHSA or HHS.

Public Domain Notice: All material in this report is in the public domain and may be reproduced or copied without permission; citation of the source is appreciated. However, this publication may not be reproduced or distributed for a fee without the specific, written authorization of the Office of Communications, SAMHSA, HHS.

Electronic Access and Copies of Publication: This publication can be accessed electronically through the Internet at www.kap.samhsa.gov. Additional free print copies can be ordered from SAMHSA’s National Clearinghouse for Alcohol and Drug Information at 800–729–6686.

Recommended Citation: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. “OxyContin®: Prescription Drug Abuse—2006 Revision.” Substance Abuse Treatment Advisory, Volume 5, Issue 1. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, April 2006.

DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 06-4138
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Printed 2006

Notes

1. WISC-TV. OxyContin: The Good, The Bad, The Deadly. Broadcast transcript. Madison, WI: WISC-TV, February 14, 2006. www.channel3000.com/health/7013912/detail.html [accessed March 2, 2006].
2. Crane, J.P. Drug use by young raises flag. The Boston Globe, February 5, 2006. www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2006/02/05/drug_use_by_young_raises_flag [accessed March 2, 2006].
3. Hammack, L. Painkiller prescriptions up significantly in region. The Roanoke Times, March 28, 2004. www.roanoke.com/roatimes/news/story164817.html [accessed March 2, 2006].
4. Reuters. Powerful painkillers fueling U.S. crime rate. Redmond, WA: MSNBC.com., March 10, 2005. www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7141313 [accessed March 2, 2006].
5. National Drug Intelligence Center. Intelligence Bulletin: OxyContin Diversion, Availability, and Abuse. Johnstown, PA: National Drug Intelligence Center, U.S. Department of Justice, August 2004. www.usdoj.gov/ndic/pubs10/10550/10550p.pdf [accessed March 3, 2006].
6. National Drug Intelligence Center. Pharmaceuticals. In: National Drug Threat Assessment 2004. Johnstown, PA: National Drug Intelligence Center, U.S. Department of Justice, April 2004. www.usdoj.gov/ndic/pubs8/8731/8731p.pdf [accessed March 3, 2006].
7. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). NIDA Infofacts: Prescription Pain and Other Medications. Washington, DC: NIDA, National Institutes of Health, 2005. www.drugabuse.gov/infofacts/PainMed.html [accessed March 3, 2006].
8. Fisher, F.B. Interpretation of “aberrant” drug-related behaviors. Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons 9(1):25–28, 2004.
9. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Emergency Department Trends From the Drug Abuse Warning Network: Final Estimates 1995–2002. DAWN Series D-24. DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 03-3780. Rockville, MD: SAMHSA, 2003. dawninfo.samhsa.gov/old_dawn/pubs_94_02/edpubs/2002final [accessed March 2, 2006].
10. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. Detoxification and Substance Abuse Treatment. Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series 45. DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 06-4131. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2006.
11. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. Initial screening, admission procedures, and assessment techniques. In: Medication-Assisted Treatment for Opioid Addiction in Opioid Treatment Programs. Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series 43. DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 05-4048. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2005, pp. 43–61.

November 14, 2010

HIV Treatment

According to Stebbing et al. (2008), "preclinical and cohort studies suggest that certain antidepressants are associated with a predisposition to cancer whereas others decrease the risk" (p. 2305). Additionally, "despite extensive data demonstrating that HIV infection and associated immunosuppression predisposes individuals to a wide range of cancers . . . (including non-AIDS-related malignancies . . .), no studies have specifically investigated the association between antidepressant use, length of antidepressant exposure, and the development of both AIDS-related and non-AIDS-related cancers in the highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and pre-HAART eras" (p. 2306).

Stebbing and colleagues therefore set out "to assess whether different classes of antidepressants were associated with changes in cancer incidence in a population of HIV-1 infected individuals, based on duration of exposure" (p. 2305). The investigators found that, within a "cohort of 10,997 patients . . . attending a large HIV center during the pre-HAART and HAART eras, a total of 2,004 (18%) were prescribed antidepressants. . . . A total of 1,607 (15%) individuals were diagnosed with cancer. There were no significant associations between any class of antidepressant and any type of cancer . . . , in either the pre-HAART or HAART era" (p. 2305). Stebbing and colleagues conclude that "antidepressants, irrespective of their class, do not affect cancer risk in HIV-infected individuals" (p. 2305).



Neuropsychological Impairment

In a racially diverse sample of 93 children living with HIV, Hochhauser, Gaur, Marone, and Lewis (2008) "examined the impact of environmental risk factors on the cognitive decline normally observed with pediatric HIV disease progression" (p. 695). The investigators found that "immunosuppression was clearly associated with poorer cognitive outcome in the high-risk children" (p. 695); in other words, there was greater risk for HIV-associated cognitive decline among children living in highly stressful environments. Notably, "this relationship was not seen in those with lower levels of environmental risk" (p. 695). These findings have several implications, according to Hochhauser and colleagues:

First, while medication adherence has been shown to be worse in stressed or disorganized families . . . , it may also be most crucial for those children, as it is they whose neuropsychological functioning is at greatest risk from HIV neurotoxicity. Second, reducing environmental stressors may prove to be neuroprotective. This may be particularly important for patients for whom reducing immunosuppression . . . may be difficult or impossible. In these cases, perhaps their impact on cognitive functioning could be moderated by taking measures to reduce stress. Such interventions might include concrete actions to improve the child's home or family environment . . . or perhaps stress-reduction interventions like psychotherapy or massage therapy. (p. 696)
http://www.aspirace.com/ for lpc continuing education

Adherence to Treatment

Leserman, Ironson, O'Cleirigh, Fordiani, and Balbin (2008) "examine[d] demographic, health behavior and psychosocial correlates (e.g., stressful life events, depressive symptoms) of nonadherence" (p. 403) among 105 men and women residing in South Florida and taking antiretrovirals. Within this sample,

44.8% had missed a medication dose in the past 2 weeks, and 22.1% had missed their medication during the previous weekend. Those with three or more stressful life events in the previous 6 months were 2.5 to more than 3 times as likely to be nonadherent (in the past 2 weeks and previous weekend, respectively) compared to those without such events. Fully 86.7% of those with six or more stresses were nonadherent during the prior 2 weeks compared to 22.2% of those with no stressors. Although alcohol consumption, drug use, and symptoms of depression were related to nonadherence in the bivariate analyses, the effects of these predictors were reduced to nonsignificance by the stressful event measure. (p. 403)

Leserman and colleagues suggest that "having many stressful events may be a more robust correlate of nonadherence than depression. Persons who report more stressful events may have more chaotic lifestyles that may account for their missed medications. . . . These findings suggest that while interventions for depression may be useful, cognitive behavioral interventions that address stress and coping may have a greater impact on adherence to HIV medication" (p. 409).

Malta, Strathdee, Magnanini, and Bastos (2008) conducted a "systematic review of studies assessing adherence to HAART among HIV-positive drug users (DU[s]) and identif[ied] . . . factors associated with non-adherence to HIV treatment" (p. 1242). The investigators selected 41 peer-reviewed studies published between 1996 and 2007; these studies included

a total of 15,194 patients, the majority of whom were HIV-positive DU[s] (n = 11,628, 76.5%). Twenty-two studies assessed adherence using patient self-reports, eight used pharmacy records, three used electronic monitoring [i.e., Medication Event Monitoring Systems (MEMS) caps], six studies used a combination of patient self-report, clinical data and MEMS-caps, and two analyzed secondary data. Overall, active substance use was associated with poor adherence, as well as depression and low social support. Higher adherence was found in patients receiving care in structured settings (e.g.[,] directly observed therapy) and/or drug addiction treatment (especially substitution therapy). (p. 1242)

Malta and colleagues conclude that, although HAART adherence was lower among DUs "than other populations – especially among users of stimulants, incarcerated DU[s,] and patients with psychiatric comorbidities – adherence to HAART among HIV-positive DU[s] can be achieved. Better adherence was identified among those engaged in comprehensive services providing HIV and addiction treatment with psychosocial support" (p. 1242). Moreover, "most papers [included in this review] suggest that the adherence to HAART among HIV-positive [DU]s can be similar to those found among other [people living with HIV/AIDS], once proper timing to initiate treatment is followed, comorbidities are properly managed and treated, psychosocial support is provided, and drug treatment, particularly substitution therapy, is instituted" (p. 1253).

Stress Management

In a departure from the traditional cognitive-behavioral approach to HIV-related stress management (research about which is coincidently and conveniently summarized in the Tool Box in the Summer 2008 issue of mental health AIDS), McCain et al. (2008) conducted a "randomized clinical trial . . . to test effects of three 10-week stress management approaches – cognitive-behavioral relaxation training (RLXN), 4 focused tai chi training (TCHI), 5 and spiritual growth groups (SPRT) 6 – in comparison to a wait-listed control group (CTRL) among 252 individuals with HIV infection" (p. 431). According to the investigators, the "purpose of the research was to determine whether the three 10-week stress management interventions would improve and sustain improvements 6 months later in the domains of psychosocial functioning, quality of life, and physical health among persons with varying stages of HIV infection. These three outcome domains, along with neuroendocrine and immune mediating variables, were measured by multiple indicators derived from the psychoneuroimmunology (PNI) paradigm" (p. 431). "Interventions were conducted with groups of 6-10 participants who met in suitably equipped conference rooms in an office setting for 90-min sessions weekly for 10 weeks. Participants who attended less than 8 of the 10 intervention sessions were deemed as having incomplete treatments and classified as withdrawn from the study" (p. 433).

McCain and colleagues found that, "in comparison to the CTRL group, both the RLXN and TCHI groups less frequently used emotion-focused coping strategies, and all three intervention groups had higher lymphocyte proliferative function. Generally, decreased emotion-focused coping can be considered an enhancement in coping strategies; however, there was no concurrent increase in problem-focused or appraisal-focused coping, making interpretation of this change more tenuous" (p. 437). Similarly, "the consistent finding of increased lymphocyte proliferation indicates the interventions were associated with enhancement in immune system functional status. . . . However, because there was no significant change in salivary cortisol, the mechanism of increased lymphocyte function is not clear. Ongoing assessment of cytokine activity or patterns of production may ultimately yield insight into other mechanisms involved in immune function changes" (pp. 437-438).

Despite these challenges in interpreting the study findings, McCain and colleagues contend that, in general,

study findings support use of the PNI-based model for stress management in individuals living with HIV infection. Despite modest effects of the interventions on psychosocial functioning in this sample, the robust finding of improved immune function with these stress management approaches has important clinical implications, particularly for persons with immune-mediated illnesses. . . . Findings of this study indicate that immune function and possibly coping and quality of life may be enhanced with cognitive-behavioral stress management, tai chi, and spirituality-based interventions. While further research is needed to examine specific effects of various stress management interventions and to expand the repertoire of alternative approaches that might be effective in enhancing adaptational outcomes, this study contributes to a growing body of well-designed research that generally lends support to the integration of stress management strategies into the standard care of individuals living with HIV infection. (p. 439)

Coping, Social Support, & Quality of Life

Murphy, Greenwell, Resell, Brecht, and Schuster (2008) "investigated current autonomy among early and middle adolescents affected by maternal HIV (N = 108), as well as examined longitudinally the children's responsibility taking when they were younger (age 6-11; N = 81) in response to their mother's illness and their current autonomy as early/middle adolescents" (p. 253). Within this sample of primarily low-income Latino and African American families residing in Los Angeles County, "children with greater attachment to their mothers had higher autonomy [when performing household-centered activities], and there was a trend for children who drink or use drugs alone to have lower autonomy. In analyses of management autonomy[, which encompasses activities performed outside the home], attachment to peers was associated with higher autonomy" (p. 253). In their longitudinal analysis of this cohort, Murphy and colleagues found that "those children who had taken on more responsibility for instrumental caretaking roles directly because of their mother's illness showed better autonomy development as early and middle age adolescents" (p. 253). Importantly, the investigators also found that autonomy was associated "with 'positive' characteristics such a mother-child bond and coping self-efficacy" (p. 271). Murphy and colleagues conclude that

"parentification" of young children with a mother with HIV/AIDS – that is, the young children taking on household responsibilities due to the mother's illness – may not negatively affect later autonomy development in these children. While it may indeed have other detrimental effects, such as more absence from school and school performance . . . , in at least this limited sample of children affected by HIV, higher responsibility taking as a result of maternal HIV/AIDS among young children was associated with later early/middle adolescent higher autonomy functioning. . . . Thus, even if they experienced some distress from parentification at an earlier age, it did not interfere with their long-term early and middle adolescent autonomous functioning. (p. 272)

Murphy and colleagues acknowledge that these findings require additional exploration with larger samples. Nevertheless, the investigators stress that if

HIV-positive mothers, due to their fatigue or illness, must rely on their young children at times to perform behaviors that most children their age do not typically perform, then it is critical that there be a strong focus on the mother developing or maintaining: (1) A high level of attachment and bond between herself and the child; and (2) strong support of the child to assist in the child developing strong coping self-efficacy. . . . [I]f a child does indeed have to sometimes function in a "parentified" role, then the data from this study indicate that children with a close attachment to their mother and who have good coping self-efficacy will have higher autonomy as they develop; these are both issues that can be worked on and improved in family therapy. (p. 272)

With a sample of 104 MSM averaging 50 years of age and living with HIV, Dutch investigators (Kraaij, van der Veek, et al., 2008) assessed relationships among "coping strategies, goal adjustment, and symptoms of depression and anxiety" (p. 395). The investigators found that "cognitive coping strategies had a stronger influence on well-being than . . . behavioral coping strategies: positive refocusing, positive reappraisal, putting into perspective, catastrophizing, and other-blame were all significantly related to symptoms of depression and anxiety. In addition, withdrawing effort and commitment from unattainable goals, and reengaging in alternative meaningful goals, in [the] case that preexisting goals can no longer be reached, seemed to be a fruitful way to cope with being HIV[-]positive" (p. 395). With regard to intervention, as Kraaij and colleagues see it, "the focus of treatment could be the content of thoughts and bringing about effective cognitive change, combined with working on goal adjustment. Various studies showed the positive effects of cognitive-behavioral oriented interventions . . . and coping effectiveness training . . . in improving psychological states in HIV-infected men. Future studies should be undertaken looking at the effectiveness of intervention programs focusing on cognitions and life goals" (p. 400).

In another study by this research group with the same sample of MSM (Kraaij, Garnefski, et al., 2008), the investigators found that greater

use of positive refocusing, refocus[ing] on planning, positive reappraisal, putting into perspective, and less use of other-blame, was related to higher levels of personal growth. . . . [P]ositive reappraisal appears to be the most powerful predictor of personal growth.

Another important predictor . . . was goal self-efficacy. Respondents who reported a higher belief in their ability to adjust their goals when important goals are obstructed by being HIV-positive, reported higher levels of personal growth. (p. 303)

As in the study described above (Kraajj, van der Veek, et al., 2008), Kraajj, Garnefski, and colleagues conclude that cognitive-behavioral oriented interventions and coping effectiveness training "could be offered to improve personal growth. The specific focus of treatment could be then the content of thoughts, combined with working on goal adjustment. Ingredients of treatment should be a combination of (positive) cognitive coping strategies and goal self-efficacy" (p. 303).

---- Compiled by Abraham Feingold, Psy.D.

--------------------

4 The structured RLXN training intervention "consisted of physical and mental relaxation skills training, with a focus on individualized combinations of relaxation techniques, as well as active coping strategies for stress management. Participants were expected to routinely practice relaxation techniques during and following the intervention, and daily practice frequency was recorded each week. Each participant was given a set of eight 30-min audiotapes specifically produced for use in this study" (p. 433).

5 A focused short form of TCHI "involving eight movements was developed for this study. The intervention sequence began with a focus on breathing and balance, both key elements in all tai chi exercises. The sequence of movements taught was focused on developing each individual's skills in balancing, focused breathing, gentle physical posturing and movement, and the active use of consciousness for relaxation. Training videotapes were provided to participants for weekly and ongoing practice of the techniques" (p. 434).

6 "The SPRT . . . intervention was designed to facilitate personal exploration of spirituality and to enhance exploration of the spiritual self and awareness of the meaning and expression of spirituality. Each session was designed to explore an aspect of spirituality and included the intellectual process of knowing or apprehending spirituality; the experiential component of interconnecting one's spirit with self, others, nature, God, or a higher power; and an appreciation of the multisensory experience of spirituality. The process of weekly journal entries facilitated increased awareness and the integration of spirituality into daily life" (p. 434).

November 13, 2010

Getting Through Tough Economic Times

This guide provides practical advice on how to deal with the effects financial difficulties can have on your physical and mental health -- it covers:

•Possible health risks
•Warning signs
•Managing stress
•Getting help
•Suicide warning signs
•Other steps you can take
Possible Health Risks
Economic turmoil (e.g., increased unemployment, foreclosures, loss of investments and other financial distress) can result in a whole host of negative health effects - both physical and mental. It can be particularly devastating to your emotional and mental well-being. Although each of us is affected differently by economic troubles, these problems can add tremendous stress, which in turn can substantially increase the risk for developing such problems as:

•Depression
•Anxiety
•Compulsive Behaviors (over-eating, excessive gambling, spending, etc.)
•Substance Abuse
Warning Signs
It is important to be aware of signs that financial problems may be adversely affecting your emotional or mental well being --or that of someone you care about. These signs include:

•Persistent Sadness/Crying
•Excessive Anxiety
•Lack of Sleep/Constant Fatigue
•Excessive Irritability/Anger
•Increased drinking
•Illicit drug use, including misuse of medications
•Difficulty paying attention or staying focused
•Apathy - not caring about things that are usually important to you
•Not being able to function as well at work, school or home
Managing Stress
If you or someone you care about is experiencing these symptoms, you are not alone. These are common reactions to stress, and there are coping techniques that you can use to help manage it. They include:

•Trying to keep things in perspective - recognize the good aspects of life and retain hope for the future.
•Strengthening connections with family and friends who can provide important emotional support.
•Engaging in activities such as physical exercise, sports or hobbies that can relieve stress and anxiety.
•Developing new employment skills that can provide a practical and highly effective means of coping and directly address financial difficulties.
Getting Help
Even with these coping techniques, however, sometimes these problems can seem overwhelming and you may need additional help to get through "rough patches." Fortunately, there are many people and services that can provide help. These include your:

•Healthcare provider
•Spiritual leader
•School counselor
•Community health clinic
If you need help finding treatment services you can access our Mental Health Services Locator for information and mental health resources near you. Similarly, if you need help with a substance abuse problem you can use our Substance Abuse Treatment Facility Locator.

Specific help for financial hardship is also available, on issues such as:

•Making Home Affordable
•Foreclosure
•Reemployment
•Financial assistance
There are many other places where you can turn for guidance and support in dealing with the financial problems affecting you or someone you care about. These resources exist at the federal, state and community level and can be found through many sources such as:

•Federal and state government
•Civic associations
•Spiritual groups
•Other sources such as the government services section of a phone book
Suicide Warning Signs
Unemployment and other kinds of financial distress do not "cause" suicide directly, but they can be factors that interact dynamically within individuals and affect their risk for suicide. These financial factors can cause strong feelings such as humiliation and despair, which can precipitate suicidal thoughts or actions among those who may already be vulnerable to having these feelings because of life-experiences or underlying mental or emotional conditions (e.g., depression, bi-polar disorder) that place them at greater risk of suicide.

LCSW, MFT, LPC ceus suicide prevention
These are some of the signs you may want to be aware of in trying to determine whether you or someone you care about could be at risk for suicide:

•Threatening to hurt or kill oneself or talking about wanting to hurt or kill oneself
•Looking for ways to kill oneself
•Thinking or fantasying about suicide
•Acting recklessly
•Seeing no reason for living or having no sense of purpose in life
If you or someone you care about are having suicidal thoughts or showing these symptoms SEEK IMMEDIATE HELP. Contact your healthcare provider, mental health crisis center, hospital emergency room or the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline at 1-800-273-TALK (8255) for help.

Other Steps You Can Take
•Acknowledge that economic downturns can be frightening to everyone, but that there are ways of getting through them - from engaging in healthy activities, positive thinking, supportive relationships, to seeking help when needed from health professionals.


•Encourage community-based organizations and groups to provide increased levels of mental health treatment and support to those who are severely affected by the economy.


•Work together to help all members of the community build their resiliency and successfully return to healthy and productive lives.
For further information on mental health or substance abuse issues please visit The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA).


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Special Note to Journalists
For ideas on how to best cover sensitive issues like suicide prevention in a thoughtful and constructive manner you can check out suggestions developed by the Annenberg Public Policy Center in conjunction with leading suicide prevention experts and journalists.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.