Online Newsletter Committed to Excellence in the Fields of Mental Health, Addiction, Counseling, Social Work, and Nursing
March 17, 2011
Manic Phase of Bipolar Disorder Benefits from Breast Cancer Medication
The medication tamoxifen, best known as a treatment for breast cancer, dramatically reduces symptoms of the manic phase of bipolar disorder more quickly than many standard medications for the mental illness, a new study shows. Researchers at the National Institutes of Health's National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) who conducted the study also explained how: Tamoxifen blocks an enzyme called protein kinase C (PKC) that regulates activities in brain cells. The enzyme is thought to be over-active during the manic phase of bipolar disorder. Professional Counselor Continuing Education.
By pointing to PKC as a target for new medications, the study raises the possibility of developing faster-acting treatments for the manic phase of the illness. Current medications for the manic phase generally take more than a week to begin working, and not everyone responds to them. Tamoxifen itself might not become a treatment of choice, though, because it also blocks estrogen — the property that makes it useful as a treatment for breast cancer — and because it may cause endometrial cancer if taken over long periods of time. Currently, tamoxifen is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of some kinds of cancer and infertility, for example. It was used experimentally in this study because it both blocks PKC and is able to enter the brain.
Results of the study were published online in the September issue of Bipolar Disorders by Husseini K. Manji, MD, Carlos A. Zarate Jr., MD, and colleagues.
Almost 6 million American adults have bipolar disorder, whose symptoms can be disabling. They include profound mood swings, from depression to vastly overblown excitement, energy, and elation, often accompanied by severe irritability. Children also can develop the illness.
During the manic phase of bipolar disorder, patients are in "overdrive" and may throw themselves intensely into harmful behaviors they might not otherwise engage in. They might indulge in risky pleasure-seeking behaviors with potentially serious health consequences, for example, or lavish spending sprees they can't afford. The symptoms sometimes are severe enough to require hospitalization.
"People think of the depressive phase of this brain disorder as the time of risk, but the manic phase has its own dangers," said NIMH Director Thomas R. Insel, MD. "Being able to treat the manic phase more quickly would be a great asset to patients, not just for restoring balance in mood, but also because it could help stop harmful behaviors before they start or get out of control."
The three-week study included eight patients who were given tamoxifen and eight who were given a placebo (a sugar pill); all were adults and all were having a manic episode at the time of the study. Neither the patients nor the researchers knew which of the substances the patients were getting.
By the end of the study, 63 percent of the patients taking tamoxifen had reduced manic symptoms, compared with only 13 percent of those taking a placebo. Patients taking tamoxifen responded by the fifth day — which corresponds with the amount of time needed to build up enough tamoxifen in the brain to dampen PKC activity.
The researchers decided to test tamoxifen's effects on the manic phase of bipolar disorder because standard medications used to treat this phase, specifically, are known to lower PKC activity — but they do it through a roundabout biochemical route that takes time. Tamoxifen is known instead to block PKC directly. As the researchers suspected would happen, tamoxifen's direct actions on PKC resulted in much faster relief of manic symptoms, compared with some of the standard medications available today.
"We now have proof of principle. Our results show that targeting PKC directly, rather than through the trickle-down mechanisms of current medications, is a feasible strategy for developing faster-acting medications for mania," said Manji. "This is a major step toward developing new kinds of medications."
Findings from another recent NIMH study strengthen the results. This previous study showed that the risk of developing bipolar disorder is influenced by a variation in a gene called DGKH. The gene makes a PKC-regulating protein known to be active in the biochemical pathway through which standard medications for bipolar disorder exert their effects - another sign that PKC is a promising direct target at which to aim new medications for the illness.
"Mania isn't just your average mood swing, where any of us might feel upbeat in response to something that happens. It's part of a brain disorder whose behavioral manifestations can severely undermine people's jobs, relationships, and health," said Zarate. "The sooner we can help patients get back on an even keel, the more we can help them avoid major disruptions to their lives and the lives of people around them."
Reference
Zarate Jr. CA, Singh JB, Carlson PJ, Quiroz J, Jolkovsky L, Luckenbaugh DA, Manji HK. Efficiency of a Protein Kinase C Inhibitor (Tamoxifen) in the Treatment of Acute Mania: A Pilot Study. Bipolar Disorders, online ahead of print, September 2007.
###
The mission of the NIMH is to transform the understanding and treatment of mental illnesses through basic and clinical research, paving the way for prevention, recovery and cure. For more information, visit the NIMH website.
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) — The Nation’s Medical Research Agency — includes 27 Institutes and Centers and is a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. It is the primary federal agency for conducting and supporting basic, clinical and translational medical research, and it investigates the causes, treatments, and cures for both common and rare diseases. For more information about NIH and its programs, visit the NIH website.
March 09, 2011
International Impact of Bipolar Disorder Highlights Need for Recognition and Better Treatment Availability
The severity and impact of bipolar disorder and bipolar-like symptoms are similar across international boundaries, according to a study partially funded by NIMH. The results were published in the March 2011 issue of the Archives of General Psychiatry. Marriage and Family Therapist Continuing Education
Background
Although several studies report prevalence rates of mental disorders on an international level, the numbers have varied because each study tends to use different methodology and definitions. To remedy this, the World Health Organization’s World Mental Health (WMH) survey initiative used consistent data collection methods in 11 countries in the Americas, Europe, Asia, the Middle East and New Zealand. The survey also applied common diagnostic definitions for mental disorders found in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (DSM-IV).
NIMH researcher Kathleen Merikangas, Ph.D., and colleagues used WMH data to track prevalence rates of three subtypes of bipolar spectrum disorder—bipolar I, bipolar II and bipolar disorder not otherwise specified (BD-NOS). Bipolar I disorder is considered the classic form of the illness, in which a person experiences recurrent episodes of mania and depression. People with bipolar II disorder experience a milder form of mania called hypomania that alternates with depressive episodes. People with BD-NOS, sometimes called subthreshold bipolar disorder, have manic and depressive symptoms as well, but they do not meet strict criteria for any specific type of bipolar disorder noted in the DSM-IV. Yet, BD-NOS can significantly impair those who have it.
Results of the Study
The prevalence rates of bipolar I, bipolar II and BD-NOS were 0.6 percent, 0.4 percent, and 1.4 percent, respectively, with an overall bipolar spectrum rate of 2.4 percent. The United States had the highest prevalence rate of bipolar spectrum (4.4 percent), while India had the lowest rate (0.1 percent). More than half of those with bipolar disorder in adulthood note that their illness began in their adolescent years.
Across all countries studied, 75 percent of those who had bipolar symptoms met criteria for having at least one other disorder. Anxiety disorders, especially panic disorder, were the most common coexisting disorders, followed by behavior disorders and substance use disorders. Patterns of coexisting conditions were similar across countries.
Less than half of those with bipolar symptoms received mental health treatment. In low income countries, only 25 percent reported having contact with a mental health professional.
Significance
This study provides the first international prevalence data on bipolar disorder using reliable, standardized methodology. It highlights the international impact of bipolar disorder and the need for better recognition and treatment availability. The findings also support the notion that, given its multi-dimensional nature, bipolar disorder may be better characterized as a spectrum disorder.
In addition, because so many people note that their illness began in adolescence — a critical time of life for educational, occupational and social development — early detection, intervention, and possibly prevention of subsequent coexisting disorders and complications should be emphasized.
What’s Next
More research is needed to better define the thresholds and boundaries of bipolar symptoms. In addition, further research is needed to better understand why and how the disorder tends to originate in adolescence and persist into adulthood, and how it intersects with coexisting mental disorders.
Reference
Merikangas KR, Jin R, He J, Kessler RC, Lee S, Sampson NA, Viana MC, Andrade LH, Hu C, Karam EG, Mora MEM, Browne MO, Ono Y, Posada-Villa J, Sagar R, Zarkov Z. Prevalence and correlates of bipolar spectrum disorder in the World Mental Health Survey Initiative. Archives of General Psychiatry. March 2011. 68(3):241-251.
March 08, 2011
Most Teens with Eating Disorders Go Without Treatment
About 3 percent of U.S. adolescents are affected by an eating disorder, but most do not receive treatment for their specific eating condition, according to an NIMH-funded study published online ahead of print March 7, 2011, in the Archives of General Psychiatry. Social Worker Continuing Education
Background
Kathleen Merikangas, Ph.D., of NIMH and colleagues analyzed data from the National Comorbidity Study-Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A), a nationally representative, face-to-face survey of more than 10,000 teens ages 13 to 18. Previously published results found that about 20 percent of youth are affected by a severe mental disorder, and a substantial proportion of these youth do not receive mental health care.
In this new study, the authors tracked the prevalence of eating disorders and the proportion of those youth who received treatment for these disorders.
Results of the Study
According to the data, 0.3 percent of youth have been affected by anorexia, 0.9 percent by bulimia, and 1.6 percent by binge-eating disorder. The researchers also tracked the rate of some forms of eating disorders not otherwise specified (ED-NOS), a catch-all category of symptoms that do not meet full criteria for specific disorders but still impact a person’s life. ED-NOS is the most common eating disorder diagnosis. Overall, another 0.8 percent had subthreshold anorexia, and another 2.5 percent had symptoms of subthreshold binge-eating disorder.
In addition,
Hispanics reported the highest rates of bulimia, while Whites reported the highest rates of anorexia.
The majority who had an eating disorder also met criteria for at least one other psychiatric disorder such as depression.
Each eating disorder was associated with higher levels of suicidal thinking compared to those without an eating disorder.
Significance
The prevalence of these disorders and their association with coexisting disorders, role impairment, and suicidal thinking suggest that eating disorders represent a major public health concern. In addition, the significant rates of subthreshold eating conditions support the notion that eating disorders tend to exist along a spectrum and may be better recognized by doctors if they included a broader range of symptoms. In addition, the findings clearly underscore the need for better access to treatment specifically for eating disorders.
Reference
Swanson SA, Crow SJ, LeGrange D, Swendsen J, Merikangas KR. Prevalence and correlates of eating disorders in adolescents: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication Adolescent Supplement. Archives of General Psychiatry. Online ahead of print March 7, 2011.
March 02, 2011
New study shows that most substance abuse treatment programs accept private health insurance
Study indicates that most will be ready to adapt to greater health care coverage provided by the Affordable Care Act and Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act
A new nationwide survey of substance abuse treatment facilities reveals that in 2008 nearly two thirds (65 percent) accepted some private health insurance payment. The survey conducted by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) also indicated that there were significant differences in the level of private insurance payment acceptance among different types of substance abuse treatment facilities. Professional Counselor Continuing Education
For example, private insurance payment was accepted by 85 percent of facilities with a primary focus on mental health services, 82 percent of facilities offering general health care, and 78 percent of facilities offering a mix of mental health and substance abuse treatment services. On the other hand, private insurance payment was accepted by only 56 percent of facilities primarily focused on substance abuse treatment services and 37 percent of facilities focused on other services (e.g., providing shelter for people experiencing homelessness).
"The ability to bill third party payers including private insurers and Medicaid is critical to the survival of treatment facilities," said SAMHSA Administrator Pamela S. Hyde, J.D. "The dramatic increase in numbers of people covered with health insurance that includes coverage for mental and substance use disorders will revolutionize the behavioral health field. Treatment facilities need to be preparing now and SAMHSA has technical assistance resources available to help."
The study noted that substance abuse treatment facilities that accepted private insurance payments were far more likely than those that did not to accept payment from other sources such as Medicaid (68 percent versus 31 percent), state-financed health insurance (53 percent versus 14 percent) and Medicare (48 percent versus 12 percent).
This capacity of substance abuse programs to bill Medicaid may become more critical as Medicaid’s coverage of substance abuse services becomes more comparable to its coverage of mental health services.
Other significant differences between treatment programs that accepted private insurance payment and those that did not include the use of cognitive-behavioral therapy services at their facilities (70 percent versus 58 percent). Facilities accepting private insurance were more likely than others to accept adolescents into their programs (58 percent versus 33 percent).
The study also showed that treatment facilities located in more central large urban areas were less likely than rurally situated facilities to accept private insurance payment (54 percent versus 78 percent). In general the further away facilities were from central city areas, the more likely they were to accept private insurance payment.
The study, Acceptance of Private Health Insurance in Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities is based on data from SAMHSA’s Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS) -- a reporting system involving treatment facilities from across the country. The study was developed as part of SAMHSA’s strategic initiative on data, outcomes, and quality -- an effort to inform policy makers and service providers on the nature and scope of behavioral health issues
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)