Online Newsletter Committed to Excellence in the Fields of Mental Health, Addiction, Counseling, Social Work, and Nursing
Showing posts with label Anger Management Continuing Education CEUs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Anger Management Continuing Education CEUs. Show all posts
October 22, 2013
Anger Management: A Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Manual
Anger Management: A Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Manual
This course is designed to help you:
1. Recognize the dynamics of anger and related anger management challenges
2. Utilize appropriate cognitive behavioral anger management interventions.
3. Analyze anger management cases for power and control dynamics.
4. List potential services and interventions.
5. Promote an interdisciplinary approach.
6. Increase familiarity with group dynamics involving anger management
Course Description: This manual was designed for use by qualified substance abuse and mental health clinicians who work with substance abuse and mental health clients with concurrent anger problems. The manual describes a 12-week cognitive behavioral anger management group treatment. Each of the 12 90-minute weekly sessions is described in detail with specific instructions for group leaders, tables and figures that illustrate the key conceptual components of the treatment, and homework assignments for the group participants.
MFT, mft, lpc, lpcc, LCSW, lsw, CA BBS, online ceus, board approved, mental health ce courses, online ceus, ceus for MFTs, ce courses for counselors, Social Worker ceus, continuing education units for LPCs, MHC ceus, LCSW, ASW and MFT Intern ceus, Board approved ceus in many states, national board approval ceus, alcohol and drug abuse counselor ceus. See chart below for your
July 11, 2012
Uncontrollable anger prevalent among US youth
Intermittent Explosive Disorder affects up to 6 million US adolescents
Nearly two-thirds of U.S. adolescents have experienced an anger attack that involved threatening violence, destroying property or engaging in violence toward others at some point in their lives. These severe attacks of uncontrollable anger are much more common among adolescents than previously recognized, a new study led by researchers from Harvard Medical School finds.
The study, based on the National Comorbidity Survey Replication Adolescent Supplement, a national face-to-face household survey of 10,148 U.S. adolescents, found that nearly two-thirds of adolescents in the U.S. have a history of anger attacks. It also found that one in 12 young people—close to six million adolescents—meet criteria for a diagnosis of Intermittent Explosive Disorder (IED), a syndrome characterized by persistent uncontrollable anger attacks not accounted for by other mental disorders.
The results will be published July 2 in Archives of General Psychiatry.
IED has an average onset in late childhood and tends to be quite persistent through the middle years of life. It is associated with the later onset of numerous other problems, including depression and substance abuse, according to senior author Ronald Kessler, McNeil Family Professor of Health Care Policy at HMS and leader of the team that carried out the study. Yet only 6.5 percent of adolescents with IED received professional treatment for their anger attacks.
Study findings indicate that IED is a severe, chronic, commonly occurring disorder among adolescents, one that begins early in life. Yet the study also shows that IED is under-treated: although 37.8 percent of youths with IED obtained treatment for emotional problems in the 12 months prior to the study interview, only 6.5 percent received treatment specifically for anger. The researchers argue for the importance of identifying and treating IED early, perhaps through school-based violence prevention programs.
"If we can detect IED early and intervene with effective treatment right away, we can prevent a substantial amount of future violence perpetration and associated psychopathology," Kessler said.
To be diagnosed with IED, an individual must have had three episodes of impulsive aggressiveness "grossly out of proportion to any precipitating psychosocial stressor," at any time in their life, according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. The investigators used an even more stringent definition of IED, requiring that adolescents not meet criteria for other mental disorders associated with aggression, including bipolar disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder. As a result, researchers found that 1 in 12 adolescents met criteria for IED Anger Management CE Course
###
Collaboraters included Katie McLaughlin, an HMS assistant professor of pediatrics and psychology at Boston Children's Hospital, Jennifer Greif Green at Boston University School of Education, Alan Zaslavsky, an HMS professor of health care policy, as well as statistical programmer and data analyst Irving Hwang and Nancy Sampson, a project director at HMS.
This research was funded by the National Institute of Mental Health (U01-MH60220 and R01-MH66627), the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the John W. Alden Trust.
Harvard Medical School has more than 7,500 full-time faculty working in 11 academic departments located at the School's Boston campus or in one of 47 hospital-based clinical departments at 16 Harvard-affiliated teaching hospitals and research institutes. Those affiliates include Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Cambridge Health Alliance, Children's Hospital Boston, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Hebrew SeniorLife, Joslin Diabetes Center, Judge Baker Children's Center, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Massachusetts General Hospital, McLean Hospital, Mount Auburn Hospital, Schepens Eye Research Institute, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, and VA Boston Healthcare System.
January 26, 2010
Anger Management Continuing Education CEUs
Anger Management Continuing Education CEUs
© 2009 by Aspira Continuing Education. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be transmitted or reproduced in any form, or by any means, mechanical or electronic without written permission of Aspira Continuing Education.
1. Become familiar with cultural influences on anger management
2. Become familiar with historical influences on anger management
3. Identify poor anger management symptomology
4. Utilize fundamental anger management techniques
5. Access vital anger management mental healthcare resources
Table of Contents:
1. Definitions
2. History and Culture
3. Anger Symptoms
4. Anger Management Techniques
5. Resources
6. References
1. Definitions
The term anger management typically refers to a system of psychological therapeutic techniques and exercises by which someone with excessive or uncontrollable anger can control or reduce the triggers, degrees, and effects of an angered emotional state.
2. History and Culture
Most civilized societies consider anger as an immature or uncivilized response to frustration, threat, violation, or loss. Instead, remaining calm, levelheaded, or “turning the other cheek” is considered more socially acceptable. This conditioning can cause inappropriate expressions of anger such as uncontrolled violent outbursts, misdirected anger or repressing all feelings of anger when it would be an appropriate response to the situation. Also, anger that is constantly “bottled up” can lead to persistent violent thoughts or actions, nightmares and even physical symptoms. Anger can also aggravate an already present mental health problem such as clinical depression
A large school of thought asserts that depression is essentially anger internalized. Perhaps this is due to the fact that many depressed persons react to stress by internalizing their anger in response to physical or mental abuse or neglect from parents or others. Another impact of the depression sufferer's denial of anger is that their interpersonal relationships are often unfulfilling. Anger can fuel obsessions, phobias, addictions and manic tendencies. Many people unable to express their anger appropriately will externalize it in furious activity which can result in clinical depression or even bipolar disorder. Anger can also intensify paranoia and prejudice, even in normal, everyday situations. People tend to express their anger either passively or aggressively through the fight-or-flight response (Lehrer, Paul M.; David H. Barlow, Robert L. Woolfolk, Wesley E. Sime, 2007. Principles and Practice of Stress Management, Third Edition). The flight response is often manifested through repression and denial of anger for safety. Aggressive behavior is associated with the fight response and the use of the verbal and physical power of anger.
Anger and rage are often conceptualized to be at opposite ends of an emotional continuum, mild irritation and annoyance at one end and fury or murderous rage at the other. Recently, Sue Parker Hall (2008) has challenged this idea; she conceptualizes anger as a positive, pure and constructive emotion, which is always respectful of others; only ever utilized to protect the self on physical, emotional, intellectual and spiritual dimensions in relationships. She argues that anger originates at age 18 months to 3 years in order to provide the motivation and energy for the individuation developmental stage whereby a child begins to separate from their careers and assert their differences. Anger emerges at the same time as thinking is developing therefore it is always possible to access cognitive abilities and feel anger at the same time (Parker Hall, 2008, Anger, Rage and Relationship: An Empathic Approach to Anger Management, Routledge, London).
Parker Hall (2008) proposes that it is not anger that is problematic but rage, a different phenomenon entirely; rage is conceptualized as a pre-verbal, pre-cognition, psychological defiance mechanism which originates in earliest infancy as a response to the trauma experienced when the infant's environment fails to meet their needs. Rage is construed as an attempt to summon help by an infant who experiences terror and whose very survival feels under threat. The infant cannot manage the overwhelming emotions that are activated and need a caring other to attune to them, to accurately assess what their needs are, to comfort and soothe them. If they receive sufficient support in this way, infants eventually learn to process their own emotions. Rage problems are conceptualized as the inability to process emotions or life's experiences either because the capacity to regulate emotion has never been sufficiently developed or because it has been lost due to more recent trauma (Schore, 1994). Rage is understood as 'a whole load of different feelings trying to get out at once' (Harvey, 2004) or as raw, undifferentiated emotions, which spill out when one more life event that cannot be processed, no matter how trivial, puts more stress on the organism than they can bear. Framing rage in this way has implications for working therapeutically with individuals with such difficulties. If rage is accepted as a pre-verbal, pre-cognitive phenomenon (and most sufferers describe it colloquially as 'losing the plot') then it follows that cognitive strategies, eliciting commitments to behave differently or educational programs are contra-indicated. Parker Hall proposes an empathic therapeutic relationship to support clients to develop or recover their organismic capacity (Rogers, 1951) to process their often multitude of traumas. This approach is a critique of the dominant anger and rage interventions including probation, prison and psychology models, which she argues does not address rage at a deep enough level (Parker Hall, 2008, Anger, Rage and Relationship: An Empathic Approach to Anger Management, Routledge, London).
Historically, therapists thought that venting angry feelings was healthy and appropriate based on Freud’s “Hydraulic Model” of energy. He believed that energy could build up to the point that it would overflow and flood the system. The release was called catharsis which was an emptying of emotional reservoirs. However, contemporary research does not support this theory. Carol Tavris (1982) concluded that people who vent their anger tend to become more rather than less angry. The research consistently demonstrates that free expression of anger and hostility resulted in measurably increased angry and negative feelings.
© 2009 by Aspira Continuing Education. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be transmitted or reproduced in any form, or by any means, mechanical or electronic without written permission of Aspira Continuing Education.
1. Become familiar with cultural influences on anger management
2. Become familiar with historical influences on anger management
3. Identify poor anger management symptomology
4. Utilize fundamental anger management techniques
5. Access vital anger management mental healthcare resources
Table of Contents:
1. Definitions
2. History and Culture
3. Anger Symptoms
4. Anger Management Techniques
5. Resources
6. References
1. Definitions
The term anger management typically refers to a system of psychological therapeutic techniques and exercises by which someone with excessive or uncontrollable anger can control or reduce the triggers, degrees, and effects of an angered emotional state.
2. History and Culture
Most civilized societies consider anger as an immature or uncivilized response to frustration, threat, violation, or loss. Instead, remaining calm, levelheaded, or “turning the other cheek” is considered more socially acceptable. This conditioning can cause inappropriate expressions of anger such as uncontrolled violent outbursts, misdirected anger or repressing all feelings of anger when it would be an appropriate response to the situation. Also, anger that is constantly “bottled up” can lead to persistent violent thoughts or actions, nightmares and even physical symptoms. Anger can also aggravate an already present mental health problem such as clinical depression
A large school of thought asserts that depression is essentially anger internalized. Perhaps this is due to the fact that many depressed persons react to stress by internalizing their anger in response to physical or mental abuse or neglect from parents or others. Another impact of the depression sufferer's denial of anger is that their interpersonal relationships are often unfulfilling. Anger can fuel obsessions, phobias, addictions and manic tendencies. Many people unable to express their anger appropriately will externalize it in furious activity which can result in clinical depression or even bipolar disorder. Anger can also intensify paranoia and prejudice, even in normal, everyday situations. People tend to express their anger either passively or aggressively through the fight-or-flight response (Lehrer, Paul M.; David H. Barlow, Robert L. Woolfolk, Wesley E. Sime, 2007. Principles and Practice of Stress Management, Third Edition). The flight response is often manifested through repression and denial of anger for safety. Aggressive behavior is associated with the fight response and the use of the verbal and physical power of anger.
Anger and rage are often conceptualized to be at opposite ends of an emotional continuum, mild irritation and annoyance at one end and fury or murderous rage at the other. Recently, Sue Parker Hall (2008) has challenged this idea; she conceptualizes anger as a positive, pure and constructive emotion, which is always respectful of others; only ever utilized to protect the self on physical, emotional, intellectual and spiritual dimensions in relationships. She argues that anger originates at age 18 months to 3 years in order to provide the motivation and energy for the individuation developmental stage whereby a child begins to separate from their careers and assert their differences. Anger emerges at the same time as thinking is developing therefore it is always possible to access cognitive abilities and feel anger at the same time (Parker Hall, 2008, Anger, Rage and Relationship: An Empathic Approach to Anger Management, Routledge, London).
Parker Hall (2008) proposes that it is not anger that is problematic but rage, a different phenomenon entirely; rage is conceptualized as a pre-verbal, pre-cognition, psychological defiance mechanism which originates in earliest infancy as a response to the trauma experienced when the infant's environment fails to meet their needs. Rage is construed as an attempt to summon help by an infant who experiences terror and whose very survival feels under threat. The infant cannot manage the overwhelming emotions that are activated and need a caring other to attune to them, to accurately assess what their needs are, to comfort and soothe them. If they receive sufficient support in this way, infants eventually learn to process their own emotions. Rage problems are conceptualized as the inability to process emotions or life's experiences either because the capacity to regulate emotion has never been sufficiently developed or because it has been lost due to more recent trauma (Schore, 1994). Rage is understood as 'a whole load of different feelings trying to get out at once' (Harvey, 2004) or as raw, undifferentiated emotions, which spill out when one more life event that cannot be processed, no matter how trivial, puts more stress on the organism than they can bear. Framing rage in this way has implications for working therapeutically with individuals with such difficulties. If rage is accepted as a pre-verbal, pre-cognitive phenomenon (and most sufferers describe it colloquially as 'losing the plot') then it follows that cognitive strategies, eliciting commitments to behave differently or educational programs are contra-indicated. Parker Hall proposes an empathic therapeutic relationship to support clients to develop or recover their organismic capacity (Rogers, 1951) to process their often multitude of traumas. This approach is a critique of the dominant anger and rage interventions including probation, prison and psychology models, which she argues does not address rage at a deep enough level (Parker Hall, 2008, Anger, Rage and Relationship: An Empathic Approach to Anger Management, Routledge, London).
Historically, therapists thought that venting angry feelings was healthy and appropriate based on Freud’s “Hydraulic Model” of energy. He believed that energy could build up to the point that it would overflow and flood the system. The release was called catharsis which was an emptying of emotional reservoirs. However, contemporary research does not support this theory. Carol Tavris (1982) concluded that people who vent their anger tend to become more rather than less angry. The research consistently demonstrates that free expression of anger and hostility resulted in measurably increased angry and negative feelings.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)

